Posted by Lou Pilder on February 21, 2003, at 15:41:15
In reply to Re: Lou's response to Arthur Gibson's post » Lou Pilder, posted by shar on February 21, 2003, at 13:06:26
Shar,
You wrote,[...clarify outcomes...]
In the proposed [limiting the post to 10 words or less...], you wrote that [..and the next time.... and the next time...?]
Well, let us examine that situation. Suppose a poster posts,[...you are a stupid idiot for telling me to take cojak...it is addictive...].
Now in this case, the poster would be limited to posting in 10 words or less for a week. [Also, there would be a limit of 2 posts per day or the posts could be connected]. So the poster write again, [...you are a stupid idiot,telling me to take cojac..]. Now that is within the 10 word limit. But the poster now is in breach again and goes to the next sanction , which is to limit him/her , now, to 5 words per post. So then the poster writes,[..You are a stupid idiot] but can not post beyond the 5 word limit. But the poster is now in breach for the offending language and goes to the next sanction which is the limiting to 2 words per post. So the poster writes,[You are].
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:201785
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030221/msgs/202552.html