Posted by Simcha on February 19, 2003, at 18:31:48
In reply to Lou's response to Simcha's post » Simcha, posted by Lou Pilder on February 19, 2003, at 7:42:47
> Simcha,
> You wrote,[...he had {no} respect for anyone else on the PB board...]. Could yoou clarify how you made the conclusion that he had [...no respect for anyone on the PB board...]? If you could, then I could have a better understanding of your post and be better able to respond to it.No respect because he refused to follow the rules of netiquette. He also called people "idiots" and was proselytizing on Babble.
> You also wrote,[...find your defense... intriguing...if he was telling us to accept...instead of jesus you might support him less...].
> It has been, and is now, and will be, my position here that evryone is welcome to post on any thread his/her response to another's post. I object to others telling others to [...not post..]or [...to leave...] regardless of how they state that. Titleistguy's post is just as valuable to the board, IMO, as yours or anyone elses. If a poster wrote about Buddha or Mulhammad or others, I would defend those also to post their thoughts.I highly doubt this. That is a med board. There is a Faith board for those issues.
> You wrote,[...I am jewish and happily so...]. I am also jewish and happily so. Titleist's posts were from someone that said that they had their life saved by their faith. But that is what he [believes]. and Dr. Bob has written here that one can post [...what they believe...]or [...what they feel...].Titleistguy has not yet written here the complete explination of what he means by [...you need jesus christ...]. Perhaps if he could clarify that, then we could have a better understanding of what he means by,[...you need jesus christ instead of pills...]. Since he is expelled, I do not consider it civil to call him [ignorant] or anything else, particulary when he does not have the right to respond to those posts untill he returns. This is the administrative issue that I am addressing here. I am asking for a halt to people posting defaming posts to him and others that are not allowed to reply to those that defame them. You also wrote,[...am I off-base about supporting him because of his message...]? Yes, it is not his message that I am supporting, but his [welcomness or not welcomness]. He was blocked for what he wrote, and I am objecting here to the continuing defamation towads him after he wes expelled and can not reply to those posts directed toward him.
> You then wrote,[..let me tell you...takes a lot to get under my skin...].You also wrote,[...his comments are insulting and rude...]. Are you then subscribing to some concept that responses that are defaming to a poster are acceptable here , like using the word [ignorant] toward him, because the poster made [insulting] comments that [got under someone's skin]? Some one asked me once if I bekieved in [...an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth...]. My answer to him was,[...love your enemies, bless those who curse you,do good to those that hate you,and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you.]
> Lou
>Sheesh, nothing but shame and ignorance.
That's it Dr. Bob. Ban me... I won't be returning to this board. I've seen how it works now. I hope you all don't damage people too much. Maybe I should report this board to your professional organisation in Illinois. I'm sure that they would find all of this very interesting.
I'm outta here...
poster:Simcha
thread:201678
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20021128/msgs/201930.html