Re: the rule for language

Posted by Dr. Bob on June 22, 2002, at 11:29:08

In reply to Re: what is the rule for language? « krazy kat » Dr. Bob, posted by wendy b. on June 21, 2002, at 10:57:36

> > > in this case, omega man is being supportive, recognizing the seriousness of the issue.
> > > - kk
I agree. I didn't say he wasn't being supportive. My issue was with the language. Which was compounded by being in the subject line.
> if people can't deal with the word shit, they should reassess their tolerance levels. It's pretty much common parlance, IMO.
>
> Wendy
That's not a very, um, supportive attitude... Just because something's common doesn't mean it's a good thing.
Bob

Thread

what is the rule for language? « krazy kat Dr. Bob 6/21/02
Re: what is the rule for language? « krazy kat » Dr. Bob wendy b. 6/21/02
Re: the rule for language Dr. Bob 6/22/02
i still don't understand the rule... krazy kat 6/22/02
being supportive... » Dr. Bob krazy kat 6/22/02
bad words katekite 6/22/02
Re: i still don't understand the rule... Dr. Bob 6/22/02
Re: I still don't understand the rule, either » Dr. Bob wendy b. 6/22/02
Re: I still don't understand the rule, either Dr. Bob 6/23/02
Re: I protest ! » wendy b. Ctrlalt n del 6/23/02
In favor of real language Shar 6/23/02
Re: Opposed to language that might offend Dr. Bob 6/23/02
i like crappe, and what about regional... krazy kat 6/23/02
I cannot STAND... » Dr. Bob krazy kat 6/23/02
just in case i get a block... » krazy kat krazy kat 6/23/02
...
Re: bad words krazy kat 6/30/02

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:5720
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020510/msgs/5723.html