Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Psycho-Babble 2000

Posted by Dr. Bob on April 17, 2002, at 9:23:16

In reply to Re: Psycho-Babble 2000, posted by kiddo on April 17, 2002, at 8:56:27

> I don't think A would feel excluded if D, E, or F responded; however, they may feel slighted by B. On the other hand, I think A may feel excluded by B and C if they were given special 'status' or treatment because B and C were around longer and given a separate place for them to post where A wasn't allowed to based on the length of time they'd been around.

Even if D, E, and F still responded?

> Yes, at some point everyone does become an "old-timer" but it's "Psycho-Babble 2000" for those that have been here before or during Y2K. So regardless of when you become an "old timer" it makes no difference.

It makes no difference that they would get Psycho-Babble 2001 or Psycho-Babble 2002 or something?

> I don't think I should be given special treatment because I've been here longer...

Well, that makes you special, so you *should* get special treatment. :-) But you're free, of course, to decline to participate. Like no one *has* to go to their class reunions...

Bob


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dr. Bob thread:1324
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020308/msgs/4189.html