Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Dr. Bob---Dare anyone disagree? » JahL

Posted by Cam W. on May 28, 2001, at 10:35:42

In reply to Re: Dr. Bob---Dare anyone disagree? » Shar, posted by JahL on May 28, 2001, at 8:55:58

The fact that it has perhaps conferred upon me 'Babble-leper' status is of no concern to me.
>
• Cut the crap, Jah. You were intentionally being antagonistic without offering any valid rebuttal. Oh, and playing the self-imposed martyr doesn't look good on you.

> The fact is, said individual shld know much better. The post was thoroughly dismissive of the earnest reports given by yourself, SLS, stjames, myself & many others.

• I'm sorry, I must have missed something. When did stjames disagree with me? As for SLS, we have been playing genetics v. diasthesis game for over a year. Unlike with your post, I am not insulted by Scott's comments, but I still think that my comments are being taken out of context. You are reading things into my posts that just aren't there. And I do apologize for not being able to go to a top 5 college, thus am unable to express myself as clearly as you would like. I guess my grasp of the English language keeps me from helping others.

>Apparently we *all* can resolve our debilitating illnesses by changing our 'aberrant thinking' & coming to terms with our emotional demons. Or whatever. As if.
>
•Again, you are reading what you want to read, not what was written.

> Keep doing the good work of keeping a meds-related board, er... meds-related! :-) . There are dozens of boards out there for people to discuss religion, spirituality, yogic-flying; whatever takes their fancy as rgds treating depression.
>
• And this is civil?

> > To reiterate my point....that type of post is civil? And stating my opinion about the offending post is not? (rhetorical questions)
>
• No one has said that your post wasn't civil, except you.

> The post I am referring to was less than civil; thoroughly contemptuous in fact. However since it contained no (explicitly) personal attacks or expletives, it was deemed acceptable. Anyway, I'm in danger of opening old wounds so I'll shut my mouth.
>
• You keep saying this, but you don't do it. The way that you are carrying on, I must have struck a nerve with my post. All I was doing was making a clinical observation and you have taken my comments as a personal affront; attacking me in every subsequent post. I really don't know what you have against me, unless you are jealous of my knowledge in some way. It seems that the only way that you can contradict what I say is to attack me personally, without using my name. I forgive you.

Love Cam


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Cam W. thread:1236
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20010315/msgs/1320.html