Posted by Dr. Bob on January 29, 2001, at 10:17:41
In reply to Re: being civil--is glib always civil?, posted by NikkiT2 on January 29, 2001, at 8:18:27
> What I find in Name's posts does not exemplify support for this site, although the writing is lengthy, quasi-academic, and multisyllabic enough to thinly veil the continuous criticism of the site and its posters, particularly with respect to how it could be improved in hypothetical circumstances.
Criticizing the site I can handle, I try to be open to feedback, and it's not like the site couldn't be improved. Criticizing posters, however, is a different story.
> > if there's something specific you think I've missed, let me know, and I'll take another look.
> Name hypothesized that posters (Vesper) might have a pathological reason for posting here. That posters viciously attacked the spouse of another poster. Name described the support some people gave as pollyanna support (or something to that effect).
OK, I'll take another look. Was that all in one post? Do you have the URL handy? If not, that's OK, I'll just search for it.
Thanks for your patience, everyone, while we hash this out...
Bob
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:266
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20001124/msgs/400.html