Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: orthomolecular

Posted by Tabitha on August 3, 2016, at 7:28:57

In reply to Re: orthomolecular, posted by Hello321 on August 2, 2016, at 19:34:31

> Doesnt matter so much ifna treatment failed in cal trial after clinical trial, if that treatment still helps you. When you dont know the cause of a condition, you wont know the fix, either. But sometimes youre lucky enough to stumble upon it. Medication wise.

Well sure, it's always possible a treatment will help, even if it failed multiple trials. It's just a lot less likely. If people were so biologically unique that large trials (thousands of people) didn't detect any responders, then I think it would be very difficult to find any effective medications at all. We wouldn't have all the ones that we do have. Plus I think you'd have a very unlikely time stumbling on something. You just wouldn't have time to try enough things.

>
> I wouldnt doubt that if periactin were put through clinical trials for depression, that it could fail. It might help only 10 percent of those who try it. So there is a problem with saying a treatment isnt worth bringing to market for an illness even if it had only helped less than half who tried it.

I don't think that's correct. If a treatment helps 10 percent of people, trials would reveal that. They typically take a sample of the population, try the medication on them, and compare results to a similar group taking placebo. Better trials use a larger group of people. If ten percent responded, that would definitely register.

Just as an example, I used a treatment for cancer that gave me an 8 percent survival advantage. That means that of 100 people with similar conditions to mine, 8 more in a treatment group survived 5 years (on average) than 100 that didn't get the treatment. It's not a very big difference, but it was seen in trials, thus the medication became part of standard care.

> What really needs to be looked at is the biological effects of a med, and not what condition it is designated for.

I agree, and medical research does this.

Anyway, I'll quit banging my drum on this topic. I do appreciate you engaging with me. It helps me understand how other people think. Best wishes with your treatment.

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Tabitha thread:1090994
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20160713/msgs/1091127.html