Posted by Lou Pilder on March 24, 2016, at 19:51:32
In reply to Re: anti-Semitism and prohibitions » Lou Pilder, posted by Tabitha on March 24, 2016, at 19:25:42
>
> > Tabitha, You wrote,[...if it puts down Jews...]. The definition used here as to if a statement here is anti-Semitic is if the statement puts down Jews.
>
> No, you wrote "if it puts down Jews". The dictionary definition that I wrote is "hatred of Jews". I think there is a significant difference between being put down and being hated.
>
> Also, you did not answer my questions. Why not? Do I need to clarify anything?
>
>
> > You wrote,[...discrimination against Jews as a religion...]. (is anti-Semitism)
> > The prohibition to me here by Mr. Hsiung could fall into your category. I am also prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post the link to his prohibition to me here. But others could , so look at this post and in the post is a link to the prohibition to me by Mr. Hsiung.
> > Lou
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1076922.html
> >
>
> I think it is pretty amazing that you recall a thread from 2002 and have been holding to the rule set by Dr Bob that long ago. It shows some real perseverance. I think Dr Bob had relaxed the rules before he quit moderating here, but it's up to you if you want to stick to the original rules.
>
> Tabitha, You wrote,[...(Mr. Hsiung) has relaxed the rules...it's up to you if you want to abide by the rules...].
I do not see it that way. I think that his rules are still the same because the TOS/FAQ still has the same rules. I consider that something else is happening here because those rules are still there and if he wanted to change his rules the TOS/FAQ would show such. The new people read the TOS and take him at his word. I have also taken him at his word. So new people see that he says that he wants readers to trust him in that he is doing what he think will be good for the community as a whole and practice the Golden Rule. So I see what he is doing completely different that follows a script that could IMHO lead to the deaths of many readers here and of innocent children. You see, readers can see that defamation against me is being supportive because his TOS states that support takes precedence. If he posted in his TOS that support does not take precedence, then you could have a case. But that has not been done. Precedence means what it means. And children could take Mr. Hsiung at his word. I am sticking to the prohibitions to me here by Mr. Hsiung and abiding by the TOS here as humanly possible. I could make a mistake like any other poster. The tragedy here is that Mr. Hsiung violates his own TOS that states that when he is not on line, he has a deputy be in his place. Since that is not evident, a subset of readers could think that he is misleading readers which could cause the deaths of some readers that have taken him at his word. This could happen because the site becomes distorted, misleading and not accurate that could cause [people to take these drugs thinking that they are safer than they really are and be killed by the drugs. I think that Mr. Hsiung has a duty and responsibility to abide by his word in his TOS to prevent suicides and deaths from the drugs. This is one reason that I am here, to save lives in spite of what he has done here. Those that suffer a horrible death by these drugs, their blood will not be upon me.
Lou
>
>
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1087029
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20160306/msgs/1087528.html