Posted by Lou Pilder on August 9, 2015, at 10:46:38
In reply to Re: Lou's response-their blood » rockerchick46, posted by SLS on August 9, 2015, at 7:22:23
> Hi, Tammy.
>
> > I agree with Philipa-S*hut up.
> > Tammy
>
> I know you are offended and frustrated. I understand this. Sometimes, it is better to avoid engagement. Engagement often provokes more uncivil posting by the offending personage.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...I know you are offended...it is better to avoid engagement...the offending personage...].
I could be thought to be your subject person here. Please do not post anything that could decrease the respect, regard and confidence in which I am held or induce hostile and disagreeable opinions and feelings toward me.
Since there are no examples posted of what you say are statements that could be thought to be from me to be *offending*, then readers could think that just because I requested clarification from the poster about what she wrote, that constitutes something that makes the poster of what I am requesting clarification from to be "offended". I know of no rational reason for anyone to be offended by someone asking for clarification from someone that writes something that has unknown criteria used to make a conclusion to know what constitutes worshiping the devil. And it is conducive to the civic harmony and welfare to ask for that clarification from the poster so that others could also know if they are worshiping the devil according to Tammy's criteria, if known. Who knows what she is using to claim that devil worshipers have particular criteria to conclude such. And if it is revealed, others could be relieved if they see her criteria used to know that they do or do not worship the devil according to her.
I do not see Tammy as being offended by my request to her for identification of what she uses to deem that people do or do not worship the devil. What I do see is someone here that thinks that what I have posted could mean that she worships the devil. And without her revealing what criteria that she uses determine that, a subset of readers could feel offended that she has not posted a reply to me giving me the clarification that I have requested from her. This is because those in that subset could think that she is using evasion to keep readers from knowing what her criteria are. That could arouse suspicion and guilt and shame, which is an unsound mental health practice by Mr. Hsiung allowing Tammy to refuse to answer my request for clarification even though she posted the claim.
But worse, by not posting her criteria used, a subset of readers could think in anti-Semitic terms. They have a rational basis to think that way if they believe the ancient anti-Semitic propaganda fostered by the popular churches for centuries because anti-Semitism is based upon lies about the Jews and one of those lies involves devil worshipping and the Jews and until Tammy lists her criteria, that could be one thought. And since there is anti-Semitic propaganda being allowed to be posted as supportive here and that Mr. Hsiung posts the swastika, ancient anti-Semitic hate IMHO could be fostered here because the criteria are not stated by Tammy as to what constitutes devil worship. I think that Mr. Hsiung has a duty to require Tammy to post her criteria used to determine if someone is worshipping the devil or not and until then I think that Jews could become victims of anti-Semitic violence from reading here as what is supportive by Mr. Hsiung because there are readers that are less-confident readers and could think that anti-Semitism is supportive here because my request to her is left unanswered which deprives me the opportunity to respond to whatever she posts as her criteria used to determine if a person is worshiping the devil.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1081174
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150806/msgs/1081212.html