Posted by SLS on January 10, 2014, at 23:31:50
In reply to Re: minocycline, posted by bleauberry on January 10, 2014, at 9:11:47
You do indeed detect some agitation on my part.
> You are a science guy. I am a realville guy.
What does that mean?
Is science not real? Your realville guessing is better than science experiments?
I am confronting your words aggressively. I don't feel that they reflect "realville" at all, and you have not provided people with anything but a leap of faith that what you say is the truth. You do a good job of representing your guesses and personal theories as fact. No good. Let's see some evidence for the things you so confidently declare.
I am uncomfortable with your statements going unchallenged. I haven't yet figured out how to challenge your words without challenging you.
Would it be accurate to say that you attribute some mental illnesses to the activity of microbes? If so, which ones? Which illnesses are not due to microbes?
I hope you use the resources of the WWW to demonstrate the veracity of your contentions.
Let's go one step at a time.
Please identify the toxins that you say are responsible for mood illness (MDD; BD)?
- ScottSome see things as they are and ask why.
I dream of things that never were and ask why not.- George Bernard Shaw
poster:SLS
thread:1058144
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20140104/msgs/1058241.html