Posted by Mickapoo on November 29, 2008, at 8:44:01
In reply to Re: What is the verdict on post-2003 Nardil?, posted by SLS on November 29, 2008, at 8:40:10
> I found the new Nardil to be roughly equivalent to the old Nardil. It is hard to tell, since my previous exposures to Nardil produced only a partial response. My most recent period of Nardil therapy produced a robust response in combination with the other drugs I am taking. I did not feel that Nardil was without effect. Perhaps one needs to take a bit more of the new formulation to receive the benefit of the old formulation. I needed 90mg last time. The time before that, I seemed to be responsive at 75mg.
>Scott,
When you said you needed 90 mg last time, did you feel any positive effects before that? Or not until you reached 90? Were you taking it for social phobia or depression?Mickapoo
poster:Mickapoo
thread:864940
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20081123/msgs/865701.html