Posted by IAMtheWalrus on July 5, 2008, at 13:57:29
In reply to Re: ECT response rate, posted by linkadge on July 5, 2008, at 9:14:51
> Well, think of it this way. The statistic that is commonly used for the incidence of memory loss with ECT is apparently just a random number. Sakiem himself said that the number often quoted for the incidence of memory loss is *not* based on research.
>
> I will look for the article....
>
> So, if the numbers often publicised for the incidence of memory loss are flawed, why is it so inconcievable that those statistics used for the effectiveness are flawed?
>
> LinkadgeSo are you saying suicide is better than some memory loss?
-W
poster:IAMtheWalrus
thread:836941
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20080626/msgs/838206.html