Posted by linkadge on July 5, 2008, at 9:14:51
In reply to Re: ECT response rate, posted by BGB on July 5, 2008, at 0:48:17
Well, think of it this way. The statistic that is commonly used for the incidence of memory loss with ECT is apparently just a random number. Sakiem himself said that the number often quoted for the incidence of memory loss is *not* based on research.
I will look for the article....
So, if the numbers often publicised for the incidence of memory loss are flawed, why is it so inconcievable that those statistics used for the effectiveness are flawed?
Linkadge
poster:linkadge
thread:836941
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20080626/msgs/838152.html