Posted by Racer on January 13, 2008, at 12:43:09
In reply to Re: Deplin is a drug, not a nutritional supplement » Racer, posted by Jamal Spelling on January 13, 2008, at 12:02:01
> > I haven't tried Deplin myself, and I know it's higher in methylfolate than Metan-X is.
>
> Yes, about 10x higher it seems. I suppose Metan-X is like poor man's Deplin, lol. Except, even the OTC stuff is prohibitively expensive. So maybe just better to go straight for Deplin, I don't know.Metan-X is not OTC -- it's a "medical food," like Deplin, and available by prescription. The "medical food" label is apparently the new thing -- I'm taking another, Limbrel, for a hip problem, as well as the Metan-X.
I agree with Scott -- if it works, it works, and sometimes the why of the how is not so clear-cut as A therefore B resulting in C. (And I must be feeling obsessive again, after stopping EMSAM, since I'm really loving that phrase, "the why of the how..." Sad, isn't it, when we miss our symptoms?)
poster:Racer
thread:806127
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20080105/msgs/806155.html