Posted by laima on February 4, 2007, at 10:45:56
In reply to Re: Why don't they make a transdermal Nardil?, posted by djmmm on February 2, 2007, at 6:07:58
Ah- but same could have been said about selegeline! The novelty, the new market would come from having a safer and hence more appealing version of a medication many have shunned due to the risks involved with oral version. I'm sure other maoi patches are on the way- someone posted around here somewhere that selegeline was the first to be developed into patch technology because it is the one most easily absorbed through skin- so it was the technically simplest one to start with. (Something like that.) So now they got THAT down, they can continue to work with the technology, build on it, and tackle some more difficult conversions.
> > And how can I post a topic subject line with no message (nm)?
>
> unfortunately, there is no money to be gained from a transdermal form of a 50 year old medication. :(
poster:laima
thread:728900
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20070201/msgs/729600.html