Posted by Iansf on February 2, 2007, at 18:15:28
In reply to Re: Why don't they make a transdermal Nardil? » psychobot5000, posted by ed_uk on February 2, 2007, at 14:37:48
> Even if it was possible (I don't know whether it is), sales would be too low to justify the expense of development.
>
> EdI don't see why sales would be lower than for Emsam, nor that it would be any more expensive to develop transdermal Nardil than it was to develop transdermal selegiline.
poster:Iansf
thread:728900
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20070201/msgs/729153.html