Re: ECT » Mr.Scott

Posted by ed_uk on June 28, 2005, at 5:01:10

In reply to Re: ECT, posted by Mr.Scott on June 28, 2005, at 3:38:09

Dear Scott,
I'm not trying to stigmatise ECT. I'm very pleased that you're benefitting from it so much :-) In fact, it's quite fantastic. You really are like a different person - in a good way :-)
I have known people to benefit greatly from ECT, you are one of them :-) I have also known people who've been severely damaged by it.....lost massive chunks of memory etc.
I hope I haven't offended you. I started this thread because I wanted to understand the technical aspects of ECT........current, voltage, charge etc. I must admit I was rather surprised that they used 0.9A!
Yours
~Ed
PS. Please keep posting :-)

Thread

ECT - high voltage? ed_uk 6/26/05
...
Re: 450 Volt ECT Camille Dumont 6/27/05
Current » rod ed_uk 6/27/05
ECT » ixus ed_uk 6/27/05
I posted the wrong link-see post to Ixus for new (nm) ed_uk 6/27/05
Re: Current » ed_uk rod 6/27/05
Re: Current » rod ed_uk 6/27/05
0.9 Amps » rod ed_uk 6/27/05
Re: 0.9 Amps » ed_uk rod 6/27/05
Re: 0.9 Amps » ed_uk ixus 6/27/05
Re: 0.9 Amps » ixus ed_uk 6/27/05
Re: 0.9 Amps » rod ed_uk 6/27/05
Re: ECT Mr.Scott 6/28/05
Re: ECT » Mr.Scott ed_uk 6/28/05
Re: ECT - high voltage? Sebastian 6/28/05
Re: ECT » ed_uk Mr.Scott 6/29/05
Re: ECT » Mr.Scott ed_uk 6/30/05

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:ed_uk thread:519427
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20050627/msgs/520359.html

	for
in