Posted by rod on April 9, 2004, at 5:40:22
In reply to Re: AMINEPTINE(survector)new source » rod, posted by douglass on April 9, 2004, at 5:21:29
> > I am wondering. A few days ago, a preson posted that she got totally different pills than the original ones, from the source you mention. And then, a few days after that, someone pops up the board, promoting this source, and calles it a "new" source... Is this a coincidence? Or are you the person behind this? You also only refer to the web sites from xxx. I guess xxx and the source have something to do with each other...
> > Just a few thoughts
>
> > And as a little "add-on", here is a link to a document, stating that amineptine was declared as a schedule II substance from the "Comission on Narcotic Drugs" of the United Nations (30. May 2003). I guess this affects all countries in the world.
> > http://www.unodc.org/pdf/document_2003-04-30_1.pdf
> >
> > Roland
>
> yes, this is a coincidence. I know nothing of the other personclaiming a new source, and as far as I know the two sites mentioned have nothing to do with each other
> >Ok. Then sorry for suspecting you.
> as far as the document you produce, I am pretty sure that the UN sched II
> recommendation has to be specifically adopted by
> member countries for it to go into effect.
>
>I also think so. And it seems like brasil adopted the recommendation, because I know of a brisilian online pharmacy, which tells one that its a controlled substance (If you click on the order button, you get a pop up window which informs you that it is a controlled substance which can not be ordered online).
Roland
poster:rod
thread:328237
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20040407/msgs/334422.html