Posted by kid_A on August 10, 2001, at 16:24:55
In reply to Re: Benzodiazipines and sixth sense, posted by Georgie Geordie on August 9, 2001, at 11:41:28
> Hey you misunderstand me...all that paper did was prove the process existed...in mind.....
I guess I still don't see that in the paper; by the process I assume you are refering to a form of sixth sense ability? I think in any schizo-affinitive types there could be any abnormal brain activity, so the specrtum is broad as concerns that...
> Does entanglement allow say an image which is stored as a spatial firing pattern distributed in the cortex to spin out a partnered version through a medium as disruptive as air..to someone else with ungated sensiromotor regions ?
In quantum physics let say that a particle is a switch, the states of the switch are on for not-decayed, and off, for having decayed. now the switch is either off or it is on, but due to quantum mechanics, sometimes the switch can be -both- off and on simultaneously... when there is a link, between two particles, when one switch is on, the other is also on, and when one switch is both on and off, the other is both on and off as well... this is called entaglement...
Usually partners in quantum physics are reserved for virtual particles, I believe one partner w/ postive energy and one w/ negative energy, and these particles generally collide randomly and produce other particles...
Photons, the particles of light, are massless, so they don't decay... in effect photons don't experience time, no time, no decay...
I'm still probably misunderstanding the thrust of the argument entirely, but what I'm saying of quantum mechanics is at least a fairly rough popular science summary...
poster:kid_A
thread:73868
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20010809/msgs/74515.html