Re: Ramon y Cajal

Posted by Noa on February 18, 2000, at 12:38:13

In reply to Re: Ramon y Cajal, posted by Adam on February 18, 2000, at 11:27:25

Another possible reason he didn't make it into general knowledge in our culture, is that the science wasn't in a place to run with his discoveries. For the same reason, the theories of psychoanalysis filled a void, because the technology wasn't there to develop the science of the brain. Now that the technology is kicking into gear, well, it seems apt to resurrect Senor (el doctor?) Ramon y Cajal, doesn't it?

Thread

Freud and his relevance Jeb 2/13/00
...
Re: Freud and his relevance Scott L. Schofield 2/14/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Sigolene 2/14/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Seamus 2/15/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Vesper 2/16/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Noa 2/16/00
Re: Freud and his relevance saint james 2/17/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Adam 2/17/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Elizabeth 2/17/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Adam 2/17/00
Ramon y Cajal Elizabeth 2/18/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Kim 2/18/00
Re: Ramon y Cajal Adam 2/18/00
Re: Ramon y Cajal Noa 2/18/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Eric 2/18/00
Re: Freud and his relevance Cam W. 2/18/00
Re: Ramon y Cajal vs the power of PR dj 2/19/00
Re: Freud, Buddha and their co-relevance dj 2/19/00
Re: Freud in Context Noa 2/19/00
Re: Ramon y Cajal vs the power of PR V. 2/19/00
Out walking the dogma... bob 2/20/00
Re: Out walking the dogma... Adam 2/22/00
Re: Out walking the dogma... Elizabeth 2/22/00
Re: Out walking the dogma... Adam 2/23/00
Re: Out walking the dogma... Cindy W 2/28/00

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Noa thread:21333
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20000209/msgs/22256.html

	for
in