Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 1057668

Shown: posts 2 to 26 of 91. Go back in thread:

 

Re: correction: Lou's response-blehmvkdm » Lou Pilder

Posted by Phillipa on January 3, 2014, at 17:58:57

In reply to correction: Lou's response-blehmvkdm, posted by Lou Pilder on January 1, 2014, at 20:39:40

Quite a few? PJ

 

Just a few. » Lou Pilder

Posted by SLS on January 3, 2014, at 17:58:57

In reply to Lou's response-blehmvkdm » Twinleaf, posted by Lou Pilder on January 1, 2014, at 20:32:01

> B. The long-standing administrative policies that were broken to accommodate me, were:
> _____________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________


How about your putting down others by accusing them of being responsible for fostering antisemitism.

How about the exaggerations and overgeneralizations in your warnings to people that they should not listen to their doctors, but, rather, believe those things to be found on the eHealthme website that you habitually cite almost exclusively.

I only wish that you were posting things that you knew not to be true so as to have you be sanctioned by administration (e.g. your contention that any organic compound containing a benzene ring is poisonous). They are untrue, of course, but that you really believe them is lamentable.

Your posts could arouse sentiments of anti-psychiatry. This could influence people to forgo medical treatment and could leave them in a condition that allows them to kill themselves or others.

In what ways do you feel that your posts contribute to civic harmony on Psycho-Babble?


- Scott

 

Not wonderful Not accomodating » Lou Pilder

Posted by HomelyCygnet on January 3, 2014, at 17:58:58

In reply to correction: Lou's response-blehmvkdm, posted by Lou Pilder on January 1, 2014, at 20:39:40

I do not believe calling people disturbed or nuts makes anyone a wonderful poster. Dinah may of course have many other fine and useful qualities.

I have not seen any administrative policies broken to accommodate you. Quite the opposite. I believe you have been given restrictions that do not apply to other posters and that Bob has permitted years of abusive posts toward you by other posters. He has changed administrative policies in ways that disadvantage you. For example the years of refusing to take action on your posts and allowing this sort of public debate about your civility.

> > > We have lost so many wonderful posters -Dinah most definitely among them.It's easy to say you're sorry she's no longer here, but I think the loss could have been easily avoided if she had been given appropriate recognition and respect by you for the important role she played in trying to help carry out your administrative policies. The last series of posts before she blocked herself seemed to me to be completely lacking in appreciation and respect for her and the other deputies, all of whom appear to have been extremely hurt and disillusioned by your interactions with them - all while you were focussing almost entirely on Lou, and breaking your own long-standing administrative policies in order to accommodate him alone.
> > Twinleaf,
> > You wrote,[...wonderful posters-Dinah...breaking your own longstanding administrative policies (to accommodate Lou)...]
> > If you could post answers to the following, I could respond accordingly.
> > True or False:
> > A. The following post by Dinah makes her a wonderful poster.
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20131211/msgs/1055625.html
> > Fill in:
> > B. The long-standing administrative policies that were broken to accommodate me, were:
> > _____________________________________________
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> >
> > Lou
> correction:
> >
> >http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20131211/msgs/1056341.html
>
>

 

Re: Just a few. » SLS

Posted by Phillipa on January 3, 2014, at 18:15:48

In reply to Just a few. » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on January 3, 2014, at 17:58:57

Perfect!!!!

 

Re: Just a few.

Posted by SLS on January 3, 2014, at 19:58:20

In reply to Re: Just a few. » SLS, posted by Phillipa on January 3, 2014, at 18:15:48

> Perfect!!!!

It sickens me.

It really does.

I don't like disagreeing with Dr. Bob, especially with such vehemence, but this whole Lou Pilder thing has changed the milieu and personality of this website in ways that challenge my ability to reign in the triggering of my emetic chemoreceptors.

I hope some greater good will come of Dr. Bob's motivations. The cost to Psycho-Babble has been very high, and is growing higher.

I hope Twinleaf returns. I hope Dinah returns as well. Their contributions have been enormous in scope and depth.


- Scott

 

Lou's response- Not wonderful Not accomodating-:) » HomelyCygnet

Posted by Lou Pilder on January 3, 2014, at 20:31:57

In reply to Not wonderful Not accomodating » Lou Pilder, posted by HomelyCygnet on January 3, 2014, at 17:58:58

> I do not believe calling people disturbed or nuts makes anyone a wonderful poster. Dinah may of course have many other fine and useful qualities.
>
> I have not seen any administrative policies broken to accommodate you. Quite the opposite. I believe you have been given restrictions that do not apply to other posters and that Bob has permitted years of abusive posts toward you by other posters. He has changed administrative policies in ways that disadvantage you. For example the years of refusing to take action on your posts and allowing this sort of public debate about your civility.
>
>
>
> > > > We have lost so many wonderful posters -Dinah most definitely among them.It's easy to say you're sorry she's no longer here, but I think the loss could have been easily avoided if she had been given appropriate recognition and respect by you for the important role she played in trying to help carry out your administrative policies. The last series of posts before she blocked herself seemed to me to be completely lacking in appreciation and respect for her and the other deputies, all of whom appear to have been extremely hurt and disillusioned by your interactions with them - all while you were focussing almost entirely on Lou, and breaking your own long-standing administrative policies in order to accommodate him alone.
> > > Twinleaf,
> > > You wrote,[...wonderful posters-Dinah...breaking your own longstanding administrative policies (to accommodate Lou)...]
> > > If you could post answers to the following, I could respond accordingly.
> > > True or False:
> > > A. The following post by Dinah makes her a wonderful poster.
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20131211/msgs/1055625.html
> > > Fill in:
> > > B. The long-standing administrative policies that were broken to accommodate me, were:
> > > _____________________________________________
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________
> > >
> > > Lou
> > correction:
> > >
> > >http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20131211/msgs/1056341.html
> >
> > HomelyCygnet,
You wrote the above that shows that you understand a lot of the crux of the matters in question.
One of those concerns is the years of outstanding notifications and requests of mine to Mr Hsiung.

Let us look at this:
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1044219.html
>

 

Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry

Posted by Dr. Bob on January 3, 2014, at 22:09:02

In reply to Re: Just a few., posted by SLS on January 3, 2014, at 19:58:20

> I hope Twinleaf returns. I hope Dinah returns as well. Their contributions have been enormous in scope and depth.

I hope they return, too.

> Your posts could arouse sentiments of anti-psychiatry. This could influence people to forgo medical treatment and could leave them in a condition that allows them to kill themselves or others.

> I hope some greater good will come of Dr. Bob's motivations. The cost to Psycho-Babble has been very high, and is growing higher.

Lou does present a challenge to Babble. And represents a challenge to psychiatry. Every day, people forgo treatment for reasons that don't have anything to do with Lou. How might they be influenced to undergo treatment instead?

Bob

 

Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry » Dr. Bob

Posted by Phillipa on January 3, 2014, at 22:43:49

In reply to Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry, posted by Dr. Bob on January 3, 2014, at 22:09:02

If I use the word feel than can't get blocked? That's the way I understand it anyway. So how try to convince them to not believe all they read half of what they see. Phillipa

 

Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry

Posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 2:20:34

In reply to Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry, posted by Dr. Bob on January 3, 2014, at 22:09:02

> Every day, people forgo treatment for reasons that don't have anything to do with Lou. How might they be influenced to undergo treatment instead?

you could simply block them from society. confine them somewhere... in the name of 'helping'.

 

Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry

Posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 2:21:43

In reply to Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry, posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 2:20:34

you could tell them that they are causing their own suffering / distress if they don't do the 'treatment'. that they are responsible for the suffering / distress of others.

 

Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry » Dr. Bob

Posted by SLS on January 4, 2014, at 5:32:43

In reply to Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry, posted by Dr. Bob on January 3, 2014, at 22:09:02

> Lou does present a challenge to Babble. And represents a challenge to psychiatry. Every day, people forgo treatment for reasons that don't have anything to do with Lou. How might they be influenced to undergo treatment instead?

Hmm. Well, looking for a positive and constructive posture to take is a start. I'm going to try something new. We'll see.


- Scott

 

Re: correction: Lou's response-blehmvkdm » Lou Pilder

Posted by Emme_V2 on January 4, 2014, at 11:26:52

In reply to correction: Lou's response-blehmvkdm, posted by Lou Pilder on January 3, 2014, at 17:58:57

> > > We have lost so many wonderful posters -Dinah most definitely among them.It's easy to say you're sorry she's no longer here, but I think the loss could have been easily avoided if she had been given appropriate recognition and respect by you for the important role she played in trying to help carry out your administrative policies. The last series of posts before she blocked herself seemed to me to be completely lacking in appreciation and respect for her and the other deputies, all of whom appear to have been extremely hurt and disillusioned by your interactions with them - all while you were focussing almost entirely on Lou, and breaking your own long-standing administrative policies in order to accommodate him alone.
> > Twinleaf,
> > You wrote,[...wonderful posters-Dinah...breaking your own longstanding administrative policies (to accommodate Lou)...]
> > If you could post answers to the following, I could respond accordingly.
> > True or False:
> > A. The following post by Dinah makes her a wonderful poster.
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20131211/msgs/1055625.html
> > Fill in:
> > B. The long-standing administrative policies that were broken to accommodate me, were:
> > _____________________________________________
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> >
> > Lou
> correction:
> >
> >http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20131211/msgs/1056341.html
>
>

Bob,

I agree with the content of Twinleaf's post. I also feel it was expressed in a reasonably respectful manner. I strongly disagree with your blocking her.

emme

 

deja vu all over again

Posted by HomelyCygnet on January 4, 2014, at 11:58:59

In reply to Re: correction: Lou's response-blehmvkdm » Lou Pilder, posted by Emme_V2 on January 4, 2014, at 11:26:52

I don't agree with the substance of Twinleaf's message concerning Lou but it seemed to be expressed quite civilly.

 

Re: deja vu all over again

Posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 13:44:38

In reply to deja vu all over again, posted by HomelyCygnet on January 4, 2014, at 11:58:59

I think that Bob was genuinely doing his best to understand where Dinah was coming from. If I was Bob I would have felt hurt by what Twinleaf said about that. Really, very.

 

You hurt people Should you be blocked? » alexandra_k

Posted by HomelyCygnet on January 4, 2014, at 19:10:57

In reply to Re: deja vu all over again, posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 13:44:38

I don't think so. Unless you want to be.

 

This is boring. (nm)

Posted by HomelyCygnet on January 4, 2014, at 19:12:10

In reply to You hurt people Should you be blocked? » alexandra_k, posted by HomelyCygnet on January 4, 2014, at 19:10:57

 

Re: Have I hurt you? (nm) » HomelyCygnet

Posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 19:25:50

In reply to You hurt people Should you be blocked? » alexandra_k, posted by HomelyCygnet on January 4, 2014, at 19:10:57

 

Sure but that's life I guess should you be blocked (nm) » alexandra_k

Posted by HomelyCygnet on January 4, 2014, at 20:13:50

In reply to Re: Have I hurt you? (nm) » HomelyCygnet, posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 19:25:50

 

Re: Sure but that's life I guess should you be blocked

Posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 20:30:37

In reply to Sure but that's life I guess should you be blocked (nm) » alexandra_k, posted by HomelyCygnet on January 4, 2014, at 20:13:50

or maybe i should voluntarily block myself?

can you tell me more about how i've hurt you? if i can understand maybe i can do something to make it less likely to happen again.

 

no more information should you be blocked? (nm) » alexandra_k

Posted by HomelyCygnet on January 4, 2014, at 20:38:57

In reply to Re: Sure but that's life I guess should you be blocked, posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 20:30:37

 

*SHAME* alex*SHAME*

Posted by HomelyCygnet on January 5, 2014, at 9:46:46

In reply to Re: Sure but that's life I guess should you be blocked, posted by alexandra_k on January 4, 2014, at 20:30:37

I can't believe that I'm a witness to such an abuse of civility. Truly, sincerely, there is no better example of what civility actually is, than to protect individuals from the throwing of sh*t upon them.

And you just stood by...........it's also a quote from Larry's 2 week block.......yes it is.... cussedy cuss cuss hmmm maybe support my block yes support equal blocks for all

Why should Larry get a block and not me?

PS I hear deputy racer has really stinky BO (please add bonus for insulting privileged class.)

 

Re: i'm sorry you are hurting (nm) » HomelyCygnet

Posted by alexandra_k on January 5, 2014, at 13:28:08

In reply to *SHAME* alex*SHAME*, posted by HomelyCygnet on January 5, 2014, at 9:46:46

 

Re: sentiments of anti-psychiatry

Posted by Dr. Bob on January 5, 2014, at 13:48:01

In reply to *SHAME* alex*SHAME*, posted by HomelyCygnet on January 5, 2014, at 9:46:46

> Truly, sincerely, there is no better example of what civility actually is, than to protect individuals from the throwing of sh*t upon them.
>
> HomelyCygnet

My view is that civility is to choose one or more of:

> > 1. not sling it back
> > 2. shield themselves
> > 3. help others shield themselves
> > 4. notify me if they think I should respond
> > 5. express how they feel
> > 6. reflect on times they've slung it themselves, or wanted to
> > 7. support the slinger

Both #3 and #4 could be considered ways of protecting others. For example:

> I agree with the content of Twinleaf's post. I also feel it was expressed in a reasonably respectful manner. I strongly disagree with your blocking her.
>
> emme

Thanks for expressing how you feel (#5) and doing it in a civil way (#1).

--

> > Every day, people forgo treatment for reasons that don't have anything to do with Lou. How might they be influenced to undergo treatment instead?
>
> how try to convince them to not believe all they read half of what they see.
>
> Phillipa

> Hmm. Well, looking for a positive and constructive posture to take is a start. I'm going to try something new. We'll see.
>
> - Scott

Great, then we'll both be trying something new. :-)

Bob

 

Re: i'm sorry you are hurting » alexandra_k

Posted by HomelyCygnet on January 6, 2014, at 2:11:42

In reply to Re: i'm sorry you are hurting (nm) » HomelyCygnet, posted by alexandra_k on January 5, 2014, at 13:28:08

How odd that you would say something like that after all the cussedy cuss cussing you did when someone presumed to understand you! You'll be pleased to hear I'm not hurting at all. (Or maybe you won't be I wouldn't presume to know your feelings;).

Bob moved my original reply. Here's a link

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20131217/msgs/1057932.html

 

Re: *SHAME* alex*SHAME* » HomelyCygnet

Posted by SLS on January 7, 2014, at 22:39:59

In reply to *SHAME* alex*SHAME*, posted by HomelyCygnet on January 5, 2014, at 9:46:46

> I can't believe that I'm a witness to such an abuse of civility. Truly, sincerely, there is no better example of what civility actually is, than to protect individuals from the throwing of sh*t upon them.

What about convincing (teaching) the thrower of sh*t to stop throwing it?


- Scott


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.