![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 41 to 65 of 65. Go back in thread:
Posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 16:54:03
In reply to Re: Lou is causing me to take a benzo » Dinah, posted by SLS on October 24, 2012, at 10:41:45
I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for Bob. When he did show up above, it had to do with the technical problems with the board. He saw what was going on and his reply held no hint of his being interested in moderating.
Basically Lou can accuse us of whatever he likes. We can accuse him of whatever we like.
Oh happy day at babble.
I get really offended at charges of antisemetism, no matter who makes them. Sure, I usually decide Lou's not worth dealing with, because it seems pretty clear what is going on with Lou. But over time he's gotten more and more open in his accusations. It makes the place unpleasant. And I'm frankly mad as fire that Bob has left us to deal with things as best we can while giving us no tools whatsoever to do so.
The best choice for me is to go back to being mostly gone from this unmoderated board.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 16:57:05
In reply to Re: Is it possible?, posted by Phillipa on October 24, 2012, at 12:25:34
> That Lou could be a Scientologist? Just a thought as walking out the door? Phillipa
Phillipa,
I have had one encounter with some of Hubbard's lieutenants many years ago. I remember that night in May. Something came over me and I spoke to them for a long time without interruption. After I finshed speaking to them, they fell on the ground and one said, "Surely there is a God."
I never saw them again.
Lou
Posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 17:27:00
In reply to Re: Lou is causing me to take a benzo » Dinah, posted by SLS on October 24, 2012, at 10:41:45
It doesn't really matter what we do. Whether Lou is uncivil to us and we're uncivil back, or if Lou is uncivil to us and we just sit and eat it, Babble wouldn't be a pleasant place to be.
I don't actually like being uncivil any more than I like receiving incivility. Lou will never stop no matter what. I guess that's not his fault. This is, after all, a mental health board. It was the same way with my family. You can feel all the compassion in the world for someone disruptive, but that doesn't make it easier or more pleasant to be in their vicinity.
The only thing that could possibly make the place bearable, I think, is if we all found humor in Lou's behavior. That's not really likely to happen either.
What's the use? I just don't like unmoderated boards. Never have, never will.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 17:36:26
In reply to Lou, what you perceive is in your own mind, posted by Phil on October 24, 2012, at 16:48:26
> It's generated from a place of hatred that you project on others, not just here, but society in general.
>
> Look in the mirror Lou and you will see your problem.
>
> You are obsessed with finding fault in others that don't exist but I don't ever remember you saying, maybe I was wrong, maybe I misjudged. No, it's your way or the highway.
>
> Man up Lou, you are trying to make people admit fault when the fault lies within you, not them.
> You are the hater, you're ego trumps your mind. You can't love because you have to be right. You can't support others because they are wrong.
>
> You are tangled in a web of hatred and self-deception. I know as I write this that it will fall on deaf ears and a closed mind.
>
> There can only be one God and you aren't him. Fact is you hate people because no one knows the answers like you do. Are you proud to be king?
>
> You use words to hurt people and you are the one that will ruin this board because others admit faults as you assign blame.Dozens or more have left long ago not just because of Dr Bob but because of you. Are you proud of chasing mentally ill people away because you are never wrong and your ego has turned your heart to coal?
>
> It's ironic that the person here in most need of professional help is the one twisting others' words and telling them that they don't need meds, they need you.
>
> Do you ever stop posting, take a break, take a walk and see the beauty around you? Or do you plot and plan your next one thousand posts that make no sense to anyone but you.
>
> You hate more than anyone you accuse and it's only hurting you.
>
> Have you ever laughed? Have you ever apologized?
>
> Have you ever thought, wow, I can't believe I said that? Have you ever said you're sorry?
>
> Even though I'm trying, there's is no getting through to you. You want the world to follow you and quite frankly you are the scary one. SCARY.
>
> You believe you are superior to others.
> You will miss out on opportunities to learn from other people's opinions.
> You have to be right to feel important.
> Your thinking is linear or one-dimensional.
> You have a tendency to dominate a conversation, unable to converse properly, listen or have a normal back and forth dialog. You are only fixated on your opinion and cannot wait for the other person to finish speaking to counter their viewpoint. In some cases you may even interrupt the other person to interject what you need to say.
> You have to prove you are right as a way of putting others down or criticizing them. It gives you a feeling of winning, which empowers you.
> If you are wrong you feel flawed, inferior, or upset.
> Your identity is dependent on your need to feel that you are right.
>
> That's all I have to say, buddy. I don't want to be hurtful but I have to wonder if you can feel. These are the last words I'll ever say to you.
>
> Friends,
It is written above.
Now the matter here concerns as to what I am here for. I am here to save lives by giving people a way that has been revealed to me that heals people addicted and depressed.
The prohibitions to me from Mr Hsiung prevent that. And on top of that, antisemitic statements are allowed to stand which fosters hatred toward Jews and me as a Jew and establishes what support is.
That Mr Hsiung is allowing for members here to slander me, does not annul the fact that there are years of outstanding requests from me to Mr Hsiung before he allowed defamation to be promulgated toward me here openly, accusing me and using me for a scapegoat, slandering the God that I give service and worship to and posting disrespect toward Jews.
Now here is a post that has outstanding requests from me to Mr Hsiung that can arouse antisemitic violence. The statement has historical uses in the persecution and murder of Jews and is allowed to this day to stand.
The statements can be interpreted that Jews can not have forgiveness from God nor could they have Eternal Life either because they did not convert to Christianity and thearfore rejected Jesus which causes them to be left out of Eternal Life and there is no forgivness for them. This means that the Jewish children, 1 and 1/2 million of them, that were systematically torturerd in cruel experiments by psychiatrists and doctors, then murdered at Auschwitz, can not have Eternal Life or forgivness from God since they are Jews.
The post stands today as a monument of hate here, a disgrace to humanity and an offence to the Jews world -wide. And only Scott said that the post is not supportive. But Mr Hsiung says that it is OK to post it here.
Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20080809/msgs/941769.html
>
Posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 17:44:04
In reply to Lou, what you perceive is in your own mind, posted by Phil on October 24, 2012, at 16:48:26
Before my relative was put on medications, she sometimes had religious delusions of prophecy. She *was* a less angry prophet than Lou, I'll grant you that. I don't recall her accusing anyone of things like Lou does.
I remember one incident when I was little when she scared the fire out of me. She spoke in a voice that didn't seem like hers at all. It was much, much deeper. Even though everyone tried to explain delusions to me, I spent the entire day worrying that her prophecy would come true. It didn't of course.
Fortunately she decided eventually to remain on medications even outside institutions.
Medications have side effects. Not taking medications has side effects too.
Posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 17:45:55
In reply to Lou's response-, posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 17:36:26
Posted by SLS on October 24, 2012, at 17:49:44
In reply to Lou's response-, posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 17:36:26
> Mr. Hsiung,
> My Shoppe was broken down and the electric turned off. People came in and made it uninhabitable.
Are you not able to see that you have been doing to others for years that which you now complain is being done to you?No one owns a thread.
You take advantage of this policy every day when you post along threads started by others in order to further your agenda.
If the originator of a thread were to ask of you specifically not to post along that thread, would you honor their wishes?
Why should anyone be considerate of your feelings when you are not considerate of those of others? I, for one, will not entertain your request that your threads be free from challenge or comment.
Your characterization of others making your thread "uninhabitable" is ironic in that you may indeed be doing the same to an entire forum. Is this purposeful? You are too clever for it not to be. Do unto others? Okay.
You insist on posting things that would have been prohibited when Psycho-Babble was actively moderated. At the very least, I would like to see you sanctioned for overgeneralization and exaggeration.
When the "zoning commissioner" does appear, you might very well be prohibited from the posting behavior that you now engage in. I do hope so. It very well might have been a strategic error on your part for you to suggest an intervention by Dr. Bob.
I hope you soon learn to enjoy reciprocity.
- Scott
Posted by SLS on October 24, 2012, at 18:38:30
In reply to Lou's response-, posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 17:36:26
Lou,
I respect your passionate concerns regarding the dangers of antisemitism or any other type of bigotry. I share your concerns because I still see bigoted hatred exercised against the powerless by the powerful. I see that antisemitism exists in every corner of the world. However, I don't see such bigotry being exercised here on the part of the operator of Psycho-Babble.
Lou,
Where else can I find your writings on the Internet?
Lou,
I become very concerned for your welfare. I hope you have not been experiencing pain or discomfort as a result of your current efforts. I hope that you can find moments of peace. You deserve to enjoy times of quiet. However, your posting efforts elicit passionate disagreement with your language and conclusions. I am in disagreement with you, and find your postings to be deleterious to the welfare of others.
What initially attracted you to Psycho-Babble? Have you ever suffered from mental illness? If so, what were the results of your taking psychotropic drugs?
- Scott
Posted by SLS on October 24, 2012, at 18:51:56
In reply to Uncivil, of course. (nm) » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 17:45:55
How does one go about suggesting to someone that they are mentally ill without being uncivil? There must surely be a way.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 19:33:57
In reply to Re: Lou's response- » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on October 24, 2012, at 18:38:30
> Lou,
>
> I respect your passionate concerns regarding the dangers of antisemitism or any other type of bigotry. I share your concerns because I still see bigoted hatred exercised against the powerless by the powerful. I see that antisemitism exists in every corner of the world. However, I don't see such bigotry being exercised here on the part of the operator of Psycho-Babble.
>
> Lou,
>
> Where else can I find your writings on the Internet?
>
> Lou,
>
> I become very concerned for your welfare. I hope you have not been experiencing pain or discomfort as a result of your current efforts. I hope that you can find moments of peace. You deserve to enjoy times of quiet. However, your posting efforts elicit passionate disagreement with your language and conclusions. I am in disagreement with you, and find your postings to be deleterious to the welfare of others.
>
> What initially attracted you to Psycho-Babble? Have you ever suffered from mental illness? If so, what were the results of your taking psychotropic drugs?
>
>
> - Scottscottt,
You don' see on the part of the operator can be shown to you. Mr. Hsiung establishes what is supportive and thearfore th antisemiic statements in question could be seen as supportiv since they are allowed to stand. One he even says its OK tyo post it.
Lou
Posted by Phillipa on October 24, 2012, at 20:59:01
In reply to Lou's response- elrhon » Phillipa, posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 16:57:05
Lou so you admit that you have been with Scientologists? And you believed them. Did you come to accept and promote their philosopy of meds are poison? Phillipa
Posted by Phil on October 24, 2012, at 21:16:03
In reply to Re: Lou is causing me to take a benzo » SLS, posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 17:27:00
You're right, good point. One forum I was on had a 25 year old lovely psych major from Denmark moderating it. It didn't need much moderation but when someone p*ssed that girl off I thought, jeez I thought I could cuss.
She would kick *ss and take names and there were a lot of young people there. One thing is for sure, nobody did it again. Not many places you can do that though.
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 21:21:20
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-chldsui » Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on October 23, 2012, at 0:12:07
>
> > ... and if there was my perspective suppressed that could have saved their child's life, then whose blood would the dead child's be upon?
> > > Lou
>
> I call b*llsh*t. If your perspective were so imperative, then wouldn't you have a moral duty to post it as widely as possible? That you would choose this site, with its significantly declining views is a piss-poor use of your time and energy if what you have to say is so life-changing.
>
> So again, b*llsh*t. But I believe that you believe what you write. Sadly.
>
> gggg,
You wrote,
[...I believe that you believe what you write. Sadly...].
You say that it is sad that I believe what I have posted here. The operator here allows you to defame Judaism here by allowing you to post that without sanction. But does that make it right to post what you did?
If you are in some edu program, take this post to whoever is your mentor and let them tell you what you wrote means to a Jew when they read it. And the forum members here can see the hatred expoused in your post to me. If it is sad that a Jew blieves in the God that the Jews give service and worship to, is it also sad that Islamic perope believe what they believe, or th Christian or the Hindu or others? Who are you to say what peoeple can believe? Who ar you to judge my faith? Who are you to be on a mental-health forum that is open to all faiths? Who are you to be an American that welcoms all religions, all faiths, all races, all those of any national origin? Who are you to tell a Jew that is is sad that theybelieve in Judaism.
And what kind of community is this that no one comes to object to the hate posted here against Jews? It is sad, my friends. For it has been revealed to me that the God that I give service and worship to has his wrath stored up to fall down upon those that curse the Jews. And as in the days of Noah, there were the scoffers and the ridiculers and the mockers and the taunters like there is here now. And it has been revealed to me that a hard rain is gonna fall. And in that day the door on the ark will be shut to some. And they will cry out to open the door as the waters rise. And a voice will come out from the sky and say, "If you did it to the least of these my brethren, you have done it to me."
ou
Posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 21:25:53
In reply to Lou's reply-ahnttyjudehyiszm, posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 21:21:20
Lou, are you ok?
Believe it or not, I want what's best for you. My issue is with certain of your behaviors, not you as a person.
It did me a lot of good to step away from the computer and take some deep breaths. I know you don't take benzos, but maybe it would help you feel better if you step away from the computer and take some time to calm down a bit?
Take care of yourself, ok?
Posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 21:30:24
In reply to Re: Uncivil, of course. » Dinah, posted by SLS on October 24, 2012, at 18:51:56
It's a shame really that there is so much stigma attached to it. There's no shame in it. The brain is like any other part of our bodies. Sometimes it gives a hiccup or two. Why not be as matter of fact about it as possible, and treat it the same as high blood pressure or whatever.
Posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 21:35:29
In reply to Re: Lou is causing me to take a benzo » Dinah, posted by Phil on October 24, 2012, at 21:16:03
As much as I complained about Bob's moderation when he was moderating, I never once thought the board would be better with no administrative policing at all. I don't think I've ever been part of any group whatsoever that didn't have some administrative review.
I'd certainly never join a community like that.
Posted by gardenergirl on October 24, 2012, at 23:10:07
In reply to Lou's reply-ahnttyjudehyiszm, posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 21:21:20
I made no comments about Judaism, Lou. Just about your behavior. I am capable of separating those two constructs. Would that you could.
Posted by gardenergirl on October 24, 2012, at 23:11:49
In reply to Lou's reply-ahnttyjudehyiszm, posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 21:21:20
But thanks for essentially telling me I'm going to hell. Charmed, I'm sure.
Posted by SLS on October 25, 2012, at 7:15:37
In reply to Re: Lou's response- » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on October 24, 2012, at 18:38:30
Hi Lou.
Perhaps Dinah is right in that it might be in your best interests to step away from the computer for awhile:
"It did me a lot of good to step away from the computer and take some deep breaths. I know you don't take benzos, but maybe it would help you feel better if you step away from the computer and take some time to calm down a bit?"
I also agree with her sentiments when she posts the following:
"Believe it or not, I want what's best for you. My issue is with certain of your behaviors, not you as a person."
Two questions:1. Was a psychiatric diagnosis ever offered to you by a mental health professional?
2. Which psychotropic drugs did you take?
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 25, 2012, at 15:43:35
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-ahnttyjudehyiszm » Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on October 24, 2012, at 23:11:49
> But thanks for essentially telling me I'm going to hell. Charmed, I'm sure.
gg,
What in the post essentially staes that?
Lou
Posted by SLS on October 26, 2012, at 0:06:38
In reply to Lou's reply-ghnah » gardenergirl, posted by Lou Pilder on October 25, 2012, at 15:43:35
Hi Lou.
Perhaps Dinah is right in that it might be in your best interests to step away from the computer for awhile:
"It did me a lot of good to step away from the computer and take some deep breaths. I know you don't take benzos, but maybe it would help you feel better if you step away from the computer and take some time to calm down a bit?"
I also agree with her sentiments when she posts the following:
"Believe it or not, I want what's best for you. My issue is with certain of your behaviors, not you as a person."
Two questions:1. Was a psychiatric diagnosis ever offered to you by a mental health professional?
2. Which psychotropic drugs did you take?
- Scott
Posted by Lou PIlder on November 20, 2012, at 10:03:49
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-phyerofheyt » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 7:55:28
> > And the fire of hatred toward the Jews is still burning here.
>
> I find that unbelievably offensive, Lou. There's no fire of hatred burning towards Jews here. This is exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about.
>
> And I don't know what on earth gave you the idea that Dr. Bob has any notions at all about Jews. I've never known him to have any particular feelings about any religion at all, or to show any particular familiarity with any religion. I have no private knowledge of his personal beliefs, but I'd tend to believe it's not a prime concern to him if he's religious at all.
>
> Moreover, to my knowledge, while Dr. Bob deletes posts from blocked posters, and occasionally removes private information from posts, he doesn't alter posts otherwise.
>
> I suppose I believe you believe that. But that's part of the civility rules, Lou. You can believe whatever you want, true or false. But you're not allowed to make accusations - no matter how true you believe them to be.
>
> But Lou, have you not noticed that Dr. Bob is ignoring everyone's notifications? Mine included? He's not monitoring the boards! I suppose it's barely possible that he might deign to honor us with his presence on an irregular basis, and that might keep us somewhat in line. But he's not routinely replying to anyone's notifications. I've pretty much quit trying. Learned helplessness.
>
> Lou, I'm giving you the credit and dignity of holding you to the same standards as everyone else, no matter how unlikely I consider your beliefs on Dr. Bob or anything else to be.
>
> But Lou, his prohibitions against telling everyone who doesn't believe as you do that they're wrong or evil or going to h*ll is not limited to the Jewish faith. Plenty of Christians have been told that as well. As have Democrats and Republicans. His rules were made to keep divisive topics like religion and politics to interfere with the primary purpose of the board.
>
> Really, Lou. I wasn't feeling overly fond of Dr. Bob, and you've made me not only defend him, but actually like and support him again.
>
> This is what I meant by pragmatism. You started out with one goal but achieved a different one - Dr. Bob's goal.
>
> We're all your brethren Lou. Being your brethren doesn't mean we have to agree with everything you say. Perhaps you could use the phrase "followers" instead.Dinah and friends,
As long as posts are allowed to stand here that could arouse antisemitic feelings, which could provide the fuel to stoke the furnace of hatred toward the Jews, then members here could be swayed to have hostile feelings or opinions toward Jews. This is all because Mr Hsiung states here that support takes precedence so that if a statement is allowed to stand, others could think that the statement is supportive. And worse than that, Mr Hsiung states that he does in his thinking what will be good for this community as a whole and he will appreciate it if you try to accept what he does here.
The hostility that could be fostered toward the Jews by the nature of antisemitic statments being allowed to stand here, has historical parallels that Mr Hsiung has posted a prohibition to me that prevents me from posting what IMHHHO could reveal how hostility toward the Jews can turn into hatred toward the Jews, easily. You see, hostility can produce hate. And when Judaism and other faths that are not centered on Jesus are allowed to be published here as being in the catagory of the "worst", then the fuel needed for hatred to be aroused toward the Jews and those others in the statement, is made available here. The following post has the insult to Judaism and Islam and other faiths that are in the catagory stated in the post, that to this day allows others to think that what it says is supportive here. And I do not consider there to be any excsue or rationale or whatever you want to call it, to allow the statement to stand. And as long as members and Mr Hsiung allow it to stand, I consider there to be great danger to the Jews and the others catorgized in the post, for the same statement in question has resulted in 1 1/2 million Jewish children to me systematically slaughtered because they were Jews. And if hate could have the potential to be aroused by the post in question here, and is supportive here, then (redacted by respondent).
Here is the post. Look at the second list as the "worst" and then look at #5 in that list. You want to support Mr Hsiung here in him allowing the statement to stand? If so, would you take responsibility if someone has hatred toward the Jews induced into them by reading the statement here, that kills a Jew or Islamic person or others that are in the people that belong to a faith that the member says is in the "worst", and you did not rise up against the allowing of the statement to stand?
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/faith/20040729/msgs/378930.html
Posted by Lou PIlder on November 20, 2012, at 10:18:42
In reply to Lou's reply-dhaphule » Dinah, posted by Lou PIlder on November 20, 2012, at 10:03:49
> > > And the fire of hatred toward the Jews is still burning here.
> >
> > I find that unbelievably offensive, Lou. There's no fire of hatred burning towards Jews here. This is exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about.
> >
> > And I don't know what on earth gave you the idea that Dr. Bob has any notions at all about Jews. I've never known him to have any particular feelings about any religion at all, or to show any particular familiarity with any religion. I have no private knowledge of his personal beliefs, but I'd tend to believe it's not a prime concern to him if he's religious at all.
> >
> > Moreover, to my knowledge, while Dr. Bob deletes posts from blocked posters, and occasionally removes private information from posts, he doesn't alter posts otherwise.
> >
> > I suppose I believe you believe that. But that's part of the civility rules, Lou. You can believe whatever you want, true or false. But you're not allowed to make accusations - no matter how true you believe them to be.
> >
> > But Lou, have you not noticed that Dr. Bob is ignoring everyone's notifications? Mine included? He's not monitoring the boards! I suppose it's barely possible that he might deign to honor us with his presence on an irregular basis, and that might keep us somewhat in line. But he's not routinely replying to anyone's notifications. I've pretty much quit trying. Learned helplessness.
> >
> > Lou, I'm giving you the credit and dignity of holding you to the same standards as everyone else, no matter how unlikely I consider your beliefs on Dr. Bob or anything else to be.
> >
> > But Lou, his prohibitions against telling everyone who doesn't believe as you do that they're wrong or evil or going to h*ll is not limited to the Jewish faith. Plenty of Christians have been told that as well. As have Democrats and Republicans. His rules were made to keep divisive topics like religion and politics to interfere with the primary purpose of the board.
> >
> > Really, Lou. I wasn't feeling overly fond of Dr. Bob, and you've made me not only defend him, but actually like and support him again.
> >
> > This is what I meant by pragmatism. You started out with one goal but achieved a different one - Dr. Bob's goal.
> >
> > We're all your brethren Lou. Being your brethren doesn't mean we have to agree with everything you say. Perhaps you could use the phrase "followers" instead.
>
> Dinah and friends,
> As long as posts are allowed to stand here that could arouse antisemitic feelings, which could provide the fuel to stoke the furnace of hatred toward the Jews, then members here could be swayed to have hostile feelings or opinions toward Jews. This is all because Mr Hsiung states here that support takes precedence so that if a statement is allowed to stand, others could think that the statement is supportive. And worse than that, Mr Hsiung states that he does in his thinking what will be good for this community as a whole and he will appreciate it if you try to accept what he does here.
> The hostility that could be fostered toward the Jews by the nature of antisemitic statments being allowed to stand here, has historical parallels that Mr Hsiung has posted a prohibition to me that prevents me from posting what IMHHHO could reveal how hostility toward the Jews can turn into hatred toward the Jews, easily. You see, hostility can produce hate. And when Judaism and other faths that are not centered on Jesus are allowed to be published here as being in the catagory of the "worst", then the fuel needed for hatred to be aroused toward the Jews and those others in the statement, is made available here. The following post has the insult to Judaism and Islam and other faiths that are in the catagory stated in the post, that to this day allows others to think that what it says is supportive here. And I do not consider there to be any excsue or rationale or whatever you want to call it, to allow the statement to stand. And as long as members and Mr Hsiung allow it to stand, I consider there to be great danger to the Jews and the others catorgized in the post, for the same statement in question has resulted in 1 1/2 million Jewish children to me systematically slaughtered because they were Jews. And if hate could have the potential to be aroused by the post in question here, and is supportive here, then (redacted by respondent).
> Here is the post. Look at the second list as the "worst" and then look at #5 in that list. You want to support Mr Hsiung here in him allowing the statement to stand? If so, would you take responsibility if someone has hatred toward the Jews induced into them by reading the statement here, that kills a Jew or Islamic person or others that are in the people that belong to a faith that the member says is in the "worst", and you did not rise up against the allowing of the statement to stand?
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/faith/20040729/msgs/378930.html
>
> correction to link:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20040729/msgs/378930.html
Posted by Lou PIlder on November 20, 2012, at 19:16:40
In reply to Lou is causing me to take a benzo, posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 8:56:28
> For the first time in what may well be a year.
>D,
Please do not post anything about me here that could constitute using me for a scapegoat. This hampers my efforts to save lives for the scapgoating is hostility toward me that is hate. Others could get disagreeable feelings or opinions of me from what you wrote here about me.
If you are a parent reading this to make a more informed opinion as to drug your child in collaboration with a psychiatrist/doctor, just remember that children drugged could go on a lifetime of drugs that could lead to addiction and dependence and life-ruining conditions or death or the murder of others.
Lou
Here is a video that I would like for you to view before you drug your child. To see this video
A. Bring up Google
B. Type in:
[youtube,MRJN_NfyiH4]
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 27, 2012, at 14:54:07
In reply to Lou's reply-phyerofheyt-pretndontpsee, posted by Lou Pilder on October 24, 2012, at 8:29:15
> > > And the fire of hatred toward the Jews is still burning here.
> >
> > I find that unbelievably offensive, Lou. There's no fire of hatred burning towards Jews here. This is exactly the sort of thing I'm talking about.
> >
> > And I don't know what on earth gave you the idea that Dr. Bob has any notions at all about Jews. I've never known him to have any particular feelings about any religion at all, or to show any particular familiarity with any religion. I have no private knowledge of his personal beliefs, but I'd tend to believe it's not a prime concern to him if he's religious at all.
> >
> > Moreover, to my knowledge, while Dr. Bob deletes posts from blocked posters, and occasionally removes private information from posts, he doesn't alter posts otherwise.
> >
> > I suppose I believe you believe that. But that's part of the civility rules, Lou. You can believe whatever you want, true or false. But you're not allowed to make accusations - no matter how true you believe them to be.
> >
> > But Lou, have you not noticed that Dr. Bob is ignoring everyone's notifications? Mine included? He's not monitoring the boards! I suppose it's barely possible that he might deign to honor us with his presence on an irregular basis, and that might keep us somewhat in line. But he's not routinely replying to anyone's notifications. I've pretty much quit trying. Learned helplessness.
> >
> > Lou, I'm giving you the credit and dignity of holding you to the same standards as everyone else, no matter how unlikely I consider your beliefs on Dr. Bob or anything else to be.
> >
> > But Lou, his prohibitions against telling everyone who doesn't believe as you do that they're wrong or evil or going to h*ll is not limited to the Jewish faith. Plenty of Christians have been told that as well. As have Democrats and Republicans. His rules were made to keep divisive topics like religion and politics to interfere with the primary purpose of the board.
> >
> > Really, Lou. I wasn't feeling overly fond of Dr. Bob, and you've made me not only defend him, but actually like and support him again.
> >
> > This is what I meant by pragmatism. You started out with one goal but achieved a different one - Dr. Bob's goal.
> >
> > We're all your brethren Lou. Being your brethren doesn't mean we have to agree with everything you say. Perhaps you could use the phrase "followers" instead.
>
> Friends,
> The fire of hatrd toward the Jews is still burning here. And as long as members here want to defend Mr Hsiung for allowing the post to go unsanctioned, then the longer the fire hate burns here.
> In this post, which is in the archives that people can access at their will, hatred toward the Jews is spewed out upon the members here. And as long as members here deny the reality that the statements are there unsanctioned that stoke the furnace of hate, hatred toward the Jews, then longer the flame burns.
> ou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041109/msgs/428781.htmlDinah,
The torch of hate toward the Jews can be picked up here right now. One can access the archives at their will. And some even see the posts that could arouse antisemitic feelings when they are searching for something else. If there were no archives, one could have a point that the fire is not there. But not only are they there, they are considered to be civil and supportive because support takes precedence and Mr Hsiung does not wait to sanction a post because one match could cause a forest fire, and what's more, it will be good for this community as a whole according to Mr Hsiung's thinking as posted in his TOS here.
Here is a post that I would like readers to examine, for it could arouse antisemitic feelings world-wide and subject Jews to the fear of being victims of antisemitic violence. You can see the statement in question by looking at the poster's post and read the 5th line from the end. It starts with,[...The idea that the person...].
Antisemitism in a community or country or school or university can be spread when the statement like that is alllowed to stand. It is well-known the accusation toward the Jews that is promulgated in the post. But this accusation is allowed to stand. And as long as it goes unnotated by the owner/operator here, people can think that it is supportive. Supportive of what? Supportve of Hate? Hatred toward the Jews? And you want me to take the blame for you taking an addictve drug because I write here to stop the hate here from being allowed to stand?
I say to you to not blame me for any real or imagined anything in your life. I have come here to save lives, to stop the antisemitism from being allowed to stand here, and to proclaim the acceptable (redacted by respondent). You want to take a benzo because of what I want to do? There are other ways to have dialog with me here than to blame me for your drug taking of a benzo.
And were you a deputy when this was posted? If so, why did you not address it?
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20101230/msgs/1004107.html
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.