Shown: posts 1 to 15 of 15. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Dinah on June 28, 2012, at 21:48:10
I don't really understand some of your questions.
I have no degree in the subject, but growing up Mormon, I was taught a great deal of respect for the Jewish people and to respect the covenant between God and the Jewish people. I even contacted a Rabbi about converting twice, the second time in tears after I'd gotten in quite a controversy in Sunday school over a bible verse that really appalled me in its lack of respect for the Law. The Rabbi told me that perhaps God could use me where I was, to educate those in my Sunday School about the truth of Judaism and the Law. And that Judaism felt it was more important to worship as a family in unity than it was where I worshipped God.
What I meant by the elsewhere comment was that many, perhaps even most, comment areas on news websites leave me so sickened that I really ought to just avoid them. I've seen far worse there than on Babble.
Posted by Dinah on June 28, 2012, at 21:48:56
In reply to Lou's concerns, posted by Dinah on June 28, 2012, at 21:48:10
Third blue screen of death tonight. :(
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 29, 2012, at 14:43:55
In reply to Lou's concerns, posted by Dinah on June 28, 2012, at 21:48:10
> I don't really understand some of your questions.
>
> I have no degree in the subject, but growing up Mormon, I was taught a great deal of respect for the Jewish people and to respect the covenant between God and the Jewish people. I even contacted a Rabbi about converting twice, the second time in tears after I'd gotten in quite a controversy in Sunday school over a bible verse that really appalled me in its lack of respect for the Law. The Rabbi told me that perhaps God could use me where I was, to educate those in my Sunday School about the truth of Judaism and the Law. And that Judaism felt it was more important to worship as a family in unity than it was where I worshipped God.
>
> What I meant by the elsewhere comment was that many, perhaps even most, comment areas on news websites leave me so sickened that I really ought to just avoid them. I've seen far worse there than on Babble.
>
> Dianah,
YOu wrote,[..I don't really understand some of your questions...].
I am unsure as to which you do and which you do not. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. Which questions do you not understnd?
B. Is there something that you need to know to understand? If so, what needs to be known by you so that you could understand them?
C. redacted by respondent
Lou
Posted by Dinah on June 29, 2012, at 22:51:03
In reply to Lou's concerns-whtnedztubeenown » Dinah, posted by Lou Pilder on June 29, 2012, at 14:43:55
I think I've answered what I could.
Other than that I have plenty of unanswered notifications from Dr. Bob, and I suppose it's best to forget about it after a while. Letting things go leads to a happier life for me.
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2012, at 6:46:48
In reply to Re: Lou's concerns-whtnedztubeenown » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on June 29, 2012, at 22:51:03
> I think I've answered what I could.
>
> Other than that I have plenty of unanswered notifications from Dr. Bob, and I suppose it's best to forget about it after a while. Letting things go leads to a happier life for me.Dianh,
You wrote,[...it's best to forget about it after a while...Letting things go leads to a happier life for me...].
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean. If you could post answers here to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordinngly.
A. Is the {it} that you are forgeting about your outstanding notifications?
B. If the {it} that you are forgetting about is something else, what is the {it} then?
C. If the {it} is my concerns about that IMHO there is the potential for Jews to be victims of antisemitic violence due to the nature that my requests to Mr. Hsiung that are outstanding that have the request for him to state in the thread in question as to if a particular statement that is allowed to stand is supportive or not, which IMHO could lead some here to think that it is supportive because support takes precedence and Mr. Hsiung states that he does not wait to sanction a post because {one match could start a forest fire}, then are you aware of the historical parallels where people said that they would let it go when Jews were persecuted by the state?
D. redacted by respondent
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2012, at 6:56:09
In reply to Lou's concerns-chstlnhk, posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2012, at 6:46:48
> > I think I've answered what I could.
> >
> > Other than that I have plenty of unanswered notifications from Dr. Bob, and I suppose it's best to forget about it after a while. Letting things go leads to a happier life for me.
>
> Dianh,
> You wrote,[...it's best to forget about it after a while...Letting things go leads to a happier life for me...].
> I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean. If you could post answers here to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordinngly.
> A. Is the {it} that you are forgeting about your outstanding notifications?
> B. If the {it} that you are forgetting about is something else, what is the {it} then?
> C. If the {it} is my concerns about that IMHO there is the potential for Jews to be victims of antisemitic violence due to the nature that my requests to Mr. Hsiung that are outstanding that have the request for him to state in the thread in question as to if a particular statement that is allowed to stand is supportive or not, which IMHO could lead some here to think that it is supportive because support takes precedence and Mr. Hsiung states that he does not wait to sanction a post because {one match could start a forest fire}, then are you aware of the historical parallels where people said that they would let it go when Jews were persecuted by the state?
> D. redacted by respondent
> LouDinah,
Now in relation to if you are aware of the historical paralles when people did not come to the rescue of Jews (now this is before 1933 and after 1945), are you aware that the God that the Jews give service and worship to makes a declaration in the scriptures that the Jews use, to them that (redacted by respondent)will (redacted by respondent) that (redacted by respondent) the Jews and history has verified that?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2012, at 7:22:32
In reply to Lou's concerns-chstlnhk-continued, posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2012, at 6:56:09
> > > I think I've answered what I could.
> > >
> > > Other than that I have plenty of unanswered notifications from Dr. Bob, and I suppose it's best to forget about it after a while. Letting things go leads to a happier life for me.
> >
> > Dianh,
> > You wrote,[...it's best to forget about it after a while...Letting things go leads to a happier life for me...].
> > I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean. If you could post answers here to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordinngly.
> > A. Is the {it} that you are forgeting about your outstanding notifications?
> > B. If the {it} that you are forgetting about is something else, what is the {it} then?
> > C. If the {it} is my concerns about that IMHO there is the potential for Jews to be victims of antisemitic violence due to the nature that my requests to Mr. Hsiung that are outstanding that have the request for him to state in the thread in question as to if a particular statement that is allowed to stand is supportive or not, which IMHO could lead some here to think that it is supportive because support takes precedence and Mr. Hsiung states that he does not wait to sanction a post because {one match could start a forest fire}, then are you aware of the historical parallels where people said that they would let it go when Jews were persecuted by the state?
> > D. redacted by respondent
> > Lou
>
> Dinah,
> Now in relation to if you are aware of the historical paralles when people did not come to the rescue of Jews (now this is before 1933 and after 1945), are you aware that the God that the Jews give service and worship to makes a declaration in the scriptures that the Jews use, to them that (redacted by respondent)will (redacted by respondent) that (redacted by respondent) the Jews and history has verified that?
> LouFriends,
If you are interested in this discussion, I am requesting that you read the following.
Lou
To do so:
A. Go to the bottom of this page to the search box
B. Type in:
[the edict of expulsion, Spain, 1492]
usually first, you will see that it was posted posted with the word {sephardic} in it.
Posted by Dinah on June 30, 2012, at 9:29:10
In reply to Lou's concerns-chstlnhk-continued-exp 1492, posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2012, at 7:22:32
Sorry Lou. I don't understand.
But that's ok. Carry on.
Posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2012, at 9:43:03
In reply to Re: Lou's concerns-chstlnhk-continued-exp 1492, posted by Dinah on June 30, 2012, at 9:29:10
> Sorry Lou. I don't understand.
>
> But that's ok. Carry on.Dinah,
There is a correction. After if you read the following, if you ask me what it is that you do not understnd, then I could have the opportunity to tell you.
Lou'The correction is that
A. Pull up Google (not the search box here)
B. Type in:
[the edict of expulsion, Spain, 1492
Posted by ron1953 on June 30, 2012, at 11:47:21
In reply to Lou's concerns, posted by Dinah on June 28, 2012, at 21:48:10
Ya gotta hand it to Lou - what he lacks in lucidity he makes up for in persistence.
Lou, what is it you're trying to accomplish?
Posted by sigismund on June 30, 2012, at 13:56:36
In reply to Lou's concerns-allhmbra » Dinah, posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2012, at 9:43:03
I have enough energy to give what may be a correct link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Spain
I am not sure that I have the energy to read it.
But it is an interesting subject and of course part of the world. Always dangerous to be around when wars are lost.
Lou, since I have gone to the trouble to give what I hope to be a direct and correct link, would you like to explain? I fear it's unlikely somehow.
Posted by sigismund on June 30, 2012, at 14:03:41
In reply to Re: Lou's concerns-allhmbra » Lou Pilder, posted by sigismund on June 30, 2012, at 13:56:36
That should cover it.
I might print it out so I can read it.
Lou, I am clueless.
Are you not allowed to mention what happened in Spain?
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2012, at 5:18:13
In reply to Re: Lou's concerns-allhmbra » Lou Pilder, posted by sigismund on June 30, 2012, at 13:56:36
Sigusmund,
There are prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung that prevent me from posting what I would like to which IMHO could save lives here and in particular, but not limited to, prevent Jews from becomming victims of antisemitic violence.
Mr Hsiung and his deputy can control the content here by either sanctioning or not sanctioning statements that could arouse antisemitic feelings. This control of the content has historical parallels that I am prohibited from posting about here due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung. This could have the effect of creating an {indoctrination} of the members here. This indoctrination then can be seen by some IMHO to be {supportive}, since Mr. Hsiung's TOS states that he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole. And further, Mr. Hsiung asks for members here to {try} to accept what he does, to {trust} him in that. There are historical paralles that I am also prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post about here concerning that.
You see,Mr. Hsiung and his deputy can control the content here for he states that in his thinking {one match could start a forest fire}.And he is correct about that. But he also has made prohibitions to me here that prohibit me from (redacted by respondent)which could conteract (redacted by respondent) and help the Jews to be safe from (redacted by respondent) as can be seen on the admin board here, for there are outstanding requests from me to Mr. Hsiung that unless they are responded to, {I do not have the opportunity to respond accordingly). If you examine the posts there in question, you may see how an indoctrination could occur toward the Jews as long as my requests to Mr. Hsiung remian outstanding. This could then be dangerous IMHO to Jews as being victims of antisemitic violence by a reader of this site that could think that what is not sanctioned is supportive, since a psychiatrist states in his TOS that support takes precedence and that he does not wait to sanction what could {start a forest fire}. So by leaving a statement that could arouse antisemitic feelings to stand, the flame could still be burnning.
Now the fire of hate is seen in the historical record. And it is there before 1933 and after 1945. The tactics used to arouse hatred toward the Jews are well-known in the historical record. You do not have to be a mastermind to see how Jews were subjected to antisemitic violence by the members of a community as when the leaders of the commmunity foster hatred toward the Jews. This is what as known as {state-sponsored} antisemitism. And one of the tactics used by leaders to arouse hatred toward the Jews is called {anti-Judaism}. Knowing what that is, is part of the subject of this discussion.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2012, at 5:55:20
In reply to Lou's reply-the ihndok » sigismund, posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2012, at 5:18:13
> Sigusmund,
> There are prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung that prevent me from posting what I would like to which IMHO could save lives here and in particular, but not limited to, prevent Jews from becomming victims of antisemitic violence.
> Mr Hsiung and his deputy can control the content here by either sanctioning or not sanctioning statements that could arouse antisemitic feelings. This control of the content has historical parallels that I am prohibited from posting about here due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung. This could have the effect of creating an {indoctrination} of the members here. This indoctrination then can be seen by some IMHO to be {supportive}, since Mr. Hsiung's TOS states that he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole. And further, Mr. Hsiung asks for members here to {try} to accept what he does, to {trust} him in that. There are historical paralles that I am also prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post about here concerning that.
> You see,Mr. Hsiung and his deputy can control the content here for he states that in his thinking {one match could start a forest fire}.And he is correct about that. But he also has made prohibitions to me here that prohibit me from (redacted by respondent)which could conteract (redacted by respondent) and help the Jews to be safe from (redacted by respondent) as can be seen on the admin board here, for there are outstanding requests from me to Mr. Hsiung that unless they are responded to, {I do not have the opportunity to respond accordingly). If you examine the posts there in question, you may see how an indoctrination could occur toward the Jews as long as my requests to Mr. Hsiung remian outstanding. This could then be dangerous IMHO to Jews as being victims of antisemitic violence by a reader of this site that could think that what is not sanctioned is supportive, since a psychiatrist states in his TOS that support takes precedence and that he does not wait to sanction what could {start a forest fire}. So by leaving a statement that could arouse antisemitic feelings to stand, the flame could still be burnning.
> Now the fire of hate is seen in the historical record. And it is there before 1933 and after 1945. The tactics used to arouse hatred toward the Jews are well-known in the historical record. You do not have to be a mastermind to see how Jews were subjected to antisemitic violence by the members of a community as when the leaders of the commmunity foster hatred toward the Jews. This is what as known as {state-sponsored} antisemitism. And one of the tactics used by leaders to arouse hatred toward the Jews is called {anti-Judaism}. Knowing what that is, is part of the subject of this discussion.
> LouSigusmund,
Another historical tactic to arouse antisemitic feeling is to allow what is known as {demonizing a Jew or Jews}.
Here is a post that I would like for interested reade4rs to examine.
Lou
To see this post:
A. Do go to the search box at the bottom of theis page.
B. Type in:
[Lou's request to Dr.Hsiung, 7:12:38]
It could be the first, but if not, there is the number {404334} in tthe colord strip
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 17, 2013, at 8:31:33
In reply to Lou's reply-ahntiejhewdehyihzum, posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2012, at 5:55:20
> > Sigusmund,
> > There are prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung that prevent me from posting what I would like to which IMHO could save lives here and in particular, but not limited to, prevent Jews from becomming victims of antisemitic violence.
> > Mr Hsiung and his deputy can control the content here by either sanctioning or not sanctioning statements that could arouse antisemitic feelings. This control of the content has historical parallels that I am prohibited from posting about here due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung. This could have the effect of creating an {indoctrination} of the members here. This indoctrination then can be seen by some IMHO to be {supportive}, since Mr. Hsiung's TOS states that he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole. And further, Mr. Hsiung asks for members here to {try} to accept what he does, to {trust} him in that. There are historical paralles that I am also prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post about here concerning that.
> > You see,Mr. Hsiung and his deputy can control the content here for he states that in his thinking {one match could start a forest fire}.And he is correct about that. But he also has made prohibitions to me here that prohibit me from (redacted by respondent)which could conteract (redacted by respondent) and help the Jews to be safe from (redacted by respondent) as can be seen on the admin board here, for there are outstanding requests from me to Mr. Hsiung that unless they are responded to, {I do not have the opportunity to respond accordingly). If you examine the posts there in question, you may see how an indoctrination could occur toward the Jews as long as my requests to Mr. Hsiung remian outstanding. This could then be dangerous IMHO to Jews as being victims of antisemitic violence by a reader of this site that could think that what is not sanctioned is supportive, since a psychiatrist states in his TOS that support takes precedence and that he does not wait to sanction what could {start a forest fire}. So by leaving a statement that could arouse antisemitic feelings to stand, the flame could still be burnning.
> > Now the fire of hate is seen in the historical record. And it is there before 1933 and after 1945. The tactics used to arouse hatred toward the Jews are well-known in the historical record. You do not have to be a mastermind to see how Jews were subjected to antisemitic violence by the members of a community as when the leaders of the commmunity foster hatred toward the Jews. This is what as known as {state-sponsored} antisemitism. And one of the tactics used by leaders to arouse hatred toward the Jews is called {anti-Judaism}. Knowing what that is, is part of the subject of this discussion.
> > Lou
>
> Sigusmund,
> Another historical tactic to arouse antisemitic feeling is to allow what is known as {demonizing a Jew or Jews}.
> Here is a post that I would like for interested reade4rs to examine.
> Lou
> To see this post:
> A. Do go to the search box at the bottom of theis page.
> B. Type in:
> [Lou's request to Dr.Hsiung, 7:12:38]
> It could be the first, but if not, there is the number {404334} in tthe colord stripFriends,
If you have concerns in relation to what is posted in this thread, I am requesting that youy email me if you like by using the b-mail to get the email address.
Lou
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.