Posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2012, at 5:55:20
In reply to Lou's reply-the ihndok » sigismund, posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2012, at 5:18:13
> Sigusmund,
> There are prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung that prevent me from posting what I would like to which IMHO could save lives here and in particular, but not limited to, prevent Jews from becomming victims of antisemitic violence.
> Mr Hsiung and his deputy can control the content here by either sanctioning or not sanctioning statements that could arouse antisemitic feelings. This control of the content has historical parallels that I am prohibited from posting about here due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung. This could have the effect of creating an {indoctrination} of the members here. This indoctrination then can be seen by some IMHO to be {supportive}, since Mr. Hsiung's TOS states that he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole. And further, Mr. Hsiung asks for members here to {try} to accept what he does, to {trust} him in that. There are historical paralles that I am also prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post about here concerning that.
> You see,Mr. Hsiung and his deputy can control the content here for he states that in his thinking {one match could start a forest fire}.And he is correct about that. But he also has made prohibitions to me here that prohibit me from (redacted by respondent)which could conteract (redacted by respondent) and help the Jews to be safe from (redacted by respondent) as can be seen on the admin board here, for there are outstanding requests from me to Mr. Hsiung that unless they are responded to, {I do not have the opportunity to respond accordingly). If you examine the posts there in question, you may see how an indoctrination could occur toward the Jews as long as my requests to Mr. Hsiung remian outstanding. This could then be dangerous IMHO to Jews as being victims of antisemitic violence by a reader of this site that could think that what is not sanctioned is supportive, since a psychiatrist states in his TOS that support takes precedence and that he does not wait to sanction what could {start a forest fire}. So by leaving a statement that could arouse antisemitic feelings to stand, the flame could still be burnning.
> Now the fire of hate is seen in the historical record. And it is there before 1933 and after 1945. The tactics used to arouse hatred toward the Jews are well-known in the historical record. You do not have to be a mastermind to see how Jews were subjected to antisemitic violence by the members of a community as when the leaders of the commmunity foster hatred toward the Jews. This is what as known as {state-sponsored} antisemitism. And one of the tactics used by leaders to arouse hatred toward the Jews is called {anti-Judaism}. Knowing what that is, is part of the subject of this discussion.
> LouSigusmund,
Another historical tactic to arouse antisemitic feeling is to allow what is known as {demonizing a Jew or Jews}.
Here is a post that I would like for interested reade4rs to examine.
Lou
To see this post:
A. Do go to the search box at the bottom of theis page.
B. Type in:
[Lou's request to Dr.Hsiung, 7:12:38]
It could be the first, but if not, there is the number {404334} in tthe colord strip
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1020395
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1020581.html