![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 4 of 4. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Dr. Bob on July 1, 2010, at 15:38:14
In reply to Re: is anyone taking a low dose of Effexor (37.5mg)?, posted by Frank Sanello on June 26, 2010, at 12:39:23
> this poison.
Please don't exaggerate.
But please don't take this personally, either, this doesn't mean I don't like you or think you're a bad person, and I'm sorry if this hurts you.
More information about posting policies and tips on alternative ways to express oneself, including a link to a nice post by Dinah on I-statements, are in the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforceFollow-ups regarding these issues should be redirected to Psycho-Babble Administration. They, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2010, at 15:38:14
In reply to Re: please be civil » Frank Sanello, posted by Dr. Bob on June 29, 2010, at 17:41:07
Friends,
I am requesting that you click on the fllowing link to see an artile from The British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
Then if you read the article, I ask:
A. What is an exaggeration?. 2A. Was there an exaggeration by the poster in question here, in your opinion?
B. Was the poster saying that all were poisons? 2B. Was the poster giving his/her point of view?
C. Are different points of view encouraged here?
2C. Was the poster being supportive?
Now in the choices, which choice is in your opinion supportive? I like 2B, not that the other choices are wrong or such. In your opinion,is it 2B or not 2B?
Here is the link
Lou
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2000637/pdf/bcp0064-0192.pdf
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2010, at 15:38:14
In reply to Lou's request-psubpour, posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2010, at 17:34:42
> Friends,
> I am requesting that you click on the fllowing link to see an artile from The British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
> Then if you read the article, I ask:
> A. What is an exaggeration?. 2A. Was there an exaggeration by the poster in question here, in your opinion?
> B. Was the poster saying that all were poisons? 2B. Was the poster giving his/her point of view?
> C. Are different points of view encouraged here?
> 2C. Was the poster being supportive?
> Now in the choices, which choice is in your opinion supportive? I like 2B, not that the other choices are wrong or such. In your opinion,is it 2B or not 2B?
> Here is the link
> Lou
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2000637/pdf/bcp0064-0192.pdfcorrected:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2000637/pdf/bcp0064-0192.pdf
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2010, at 15:38:14
In reply to correction to lik-Lou's request-psubpour, posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2010, at 17:40:55
Friends,
I as the following;
A. What is an exaggeration?
B. Do you know that an exaggeration takes place when the statement goes beyond the bounds of truth?
C. In the case at hand, was there a basis for the statement?
D. Was the basis true?
E. Was there then an exaggeration, in your opinion?
F. Is it an exaggeration if someone posted here that the benzodiazepine, Xanax, is addictive and not to take it?
G. Is it an exaggeration if someone posted here that arsnic is a poison and not to take it?
Lou
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.