correction to lik-Lou's request-psubpour

Posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2010, at 17:40:55 [reposted on July 1, 2010, at 15:38:14 | original URL]

In reply to Lou's request-psubpour, posted by Lou Pilder on June 30, 2010, at 17:34:42

> Friends,
> I am requesting that you click on the fllowing link to see an artile from The British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
> Then if you read the article, I ask:
> A. What is an exaggeration?. 2A. Was there an exaggeration by the poster in question here, in your opinion?
> B. Was the poster saying that all were poisons? 2B. Was the poster giving his/her point of view?
> C. Are different points of view encouraged here?
> 2C. Was the poster being supportive?
> Now in the choices, which choice is in your opinion supportive? I like 2B, not that the other choices are wrong or such. In your opinion,is it 2B or not 2B?
> Here is the link
> Lou
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2000637/pdf/bcp0064-0192.pdf
corrected:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2000637/pdf/bcp0064-0192.pdf

Thread

Re: please be civil » Frank Sanello Dr. Bob 7/1/10
Lou's request-psubpour Lou Pilder 7/1/10
correction to lik-Lou's request-psubpour Lou Pilder 7/1/10
Lou's request-givpizzachants Lou Pilder 7/1/10

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Lou Pilder thread:952852
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20100321/msgs/952854.html

	for
in