![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 12 to 36 of 304. Go back in thread:
Posted by JadeKelly on April 4, 2009, at 23:24:40
In reply to Re: ****Crickets Chirping******* (nm), posted by JadeKelly on April 4, 2009, at 23:20:46
Posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2009, at 16:58:59
In reply to DR.BOB pls change/clarify rules SUGGESTIONS, posted by desolationrower on April 4, 2009, at 19:41:37
> lol slammed for defending the administration. nice lol
>
> mycoI trust the lols mean you realize it wasn't defending us that was considered uncivil. :-)
--
> the current rule system i don't think is optimal for working with how people actually interact, espcially since PB also has people who exists in perpetual unpleasant mood states, are especially impulsive, paranoid, used to not being heard or interpreted charitably, etc., and banning them sucks for the person banned.
>
> -PRINCIPLE: less 'civility warning' for honest disagreement, keep it focused to personal disagreements. in policing online fora, CLEAR rules are bad. they need to be enforced with judgement.
>
> -PRINCIPLE: punishment needs to be swift and certain for it to be useful. being blocked 20hours later is a long time off, and harsh and not particularly productive since during 100% of the ban time, the person has cooled off, and can't post about things unrelated.
>
> -NEW RULE: duputy can tell people who specifically do not get along well to not address each other
>
> -NEW RULE: better than 'banning' (the goal is to protect vulnerable, not punish the wicked or 'fix' their cruel natures, right?): let deputy 'edit' the offending post to remove personal hostility, and replace with extra politeness. save the bans for bigger cases.
>
> -GOAL: since what the person wants is to express themself, ban doesn't really work well. knowing their communication will have hostility removed, people might self-censor a bit more when they see something that makes them angry.
>
> -d/rThanks for giving this some thought and suggesting some alternatives. I do realize that it can be a challenge to be civil when in perpetually unpleasant mood states, etc. And that it can suck to be blocked.
Disagreeing in and of itself isn't considered uncivil. It can be hard to balance being predictable and using judgment. Blocked posters don't necessarily stay cool 100% of the time they're blocked.
Swifter might be better in some ways, but deputies can't be here all the time. And it would give posters less time to apologize or otherwise work things out on their own, which I'd much prefer.
Under certain conditions, posters can already be asked not to post to certain other posters:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#harassed
I think it's nice when posters themselves replace hostility with politeness. Sometimes friendly input from other posters is more effective than input, no matter how friendly, from the administration.
Again, be the change you wish to see. Show other posters how they might interpret things more charitably. Encourage them to apologize. Suggest they not address those they can't get along with. Help them avoid being blocked. A post in time saves nine.
Bob
Posted by myco on April 5, 2009, at 17:44:33
In reply to Re: SUGGESTIONS, posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2009, at 16:58:59
So you don't ever feel that you are "babysitting" Bob? Don't slam me for asking Bob a question please...that's uncalled for. I agree it's good practice for people to readjust their communication skills to be polite and compassionate for others but also the others need to add to their own skills by learning to reinterpret or perceiving things said or done in a different light. My limited experience with therapy thus far includes this as a way of reducing added stress on oneself. Try to put yourself in others shoes if you know what I mean...giving that same compassion back to those you are listening to. I don't want to argue with you here Bob...i'm just trying to justify this in my head. I don't go out of my way to hurt anyone but seriously some people take me, and others, so serious in what we say, so misinterpreted that I wonder how effective their own therapy is for them...again please don't slam me. Just trying to understand from your point of view Bob...perception plays a large role in therapy. Does it not?
I'm also trying to bring a community spirit together here...one where the board is able to accept others differences. This is difficult as this board contains many little cliques or groups who don't associate with others or avoid certain boards because they contain certain types of people etc...Bob it can be a somewhat unhealthy environment. Please offer a response and I will let the issue go...I just wanted it off my chest is all. I'm an adult...I can agree to disagree if I have to. "Thanks for listening" (Dr Fraser Crane - hey...at least a smile come on, something? a chuckle? eh? lol )
myco
---------------------> > lol slammed for defending the administration. nice lol
> >
> > myco
>
> I trust the lols mean you realize it wasn't defending us that was considered uncivil. :-)
>
> --
>
> > the current rule system i don't think is optimal for working with how people actually interact, espcially since PB also has people who exists in perpetual unpleasant mood states, are especially impulsive, paranoid, used to not being heard or interpreted charitably, etc., and banning them sucks for the person banned.
> >
> > -PRINCIPLE: less 'civility warning' for honest disagreement, keep it focused to personal disagreements. in policing online fora, CLEAR rules are bad. they need to be enforced with judgement.
> >
> > -PRINCIPLE: punishment needs to be swift and certain for it to be useful. being blocked 20hours later is a long time off, and harsh and not particularly productive since during 100% of the ban time, the person has cooled off, and can't post about things unrelated.
> >
> > -NEW RULE: duputy can tell people who specifically do not get along well to not address each other
> >
> > -NEW RULE: better than 'banning' (the goal is to protect vulnerable, not punish the wicked or 'fix' their cruel natures, right?): let deputy 'edit' the offending post to remove personal hostility, and replace with extra politeness. save the bans for bigger cases.
> >
> > -GOAL: since what the person wants is to express themself, ban doesn't really work well. knowing their communication will have hostility removed, people might self-censor a bit more when they see something that makes them angry.
> >
> > -d/r
>
> Thanks for giving this some thought and suggesting some alternatives. I do realize that it can be a challenge to be civil when in perpetually unpleasant mood states, etc. And that it can suck to be blocked.
>
> Disagreeing in and of itself isn't considered uncivil. It can be hard to balance being predictable and using judgment. Blocked posters don't necessarily stay cool 100% of the time they're blocked.
>
> Swifter might be better in some ways, but deputies can't be here all the time. And it would give posters less time to apologize or otherwise work things out on their own, which I'd much prefer.
>
> Under certain conditions, posters can already be asked not to post to certain other posters:
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#harassed
>
> I think it's nice when posters themselves replace hostility with politeness. Sometimes friendly input from other posters is more effective than input, no matter how friendly, from the administration.
>
> Again, be the change you wish to see. Show other posters how they might interpret things more charitably. Encourage them to apologize. Suggest they not address those they can't get along with. Help them avoid being blocked. A post in time saves nine.
>
> Bob
Posted by JadeKelly on April 5, 2009, at 21:35:53
In reply to Re: SUGGESTIONS, posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2009, at 16:58:59
--
> D/R
> > the current rule system i don't think is optimal for working with how people actually interact, espcially since PB also has people who exists in perpetual unpleasant mood states, are especially impulsive, paranoid, used to not being heard or interpreted charitably, etc., and banning them sucks for the person banned.
> >
> > -PRINCIPLE: less 'civility warning' for honest disagreement, keep it focused to personal disagreements. in policing online fora, CLEAR rules are bad. they need to be enforced with judgement.
> >
> > -PRINCIPLE: punishment needs to be swift and certain for it to be useful. being blocked 20hours later is a long time off, and harsh and not particularly productive since during 100% of the ban time, the person has cooled off, and can't post about things unrelated.
> >
> > -NEW RULE: duputy can tell people who specifically do not get along well to not address each other
> >
> > -NEW RULE: better than 'banning' (the goal is to protect vulnerable, not punish the wicked or 'fix' their cruel natures, right?): let deputy 'edit' the offending post to remove personal hostility, and replace with extra politeness. save the bans for bigger cases.
> >
> > -GOAL: since what the person wants is to express themself, ban doesn't really work well. knowing their communication will have hostility removed, people might self-censor a bit more when they see something that makes them angry.
> >
> > -d/r
>
>BOB
Thanks for giving this some thought and suggesting some alternatives. I do realize that it can be a challenge to be civil when in perpetually unpleasant mood states, etc. And that it can suck to be blocked. REPEAT=NO CHANGE
>
> Disagreeing in and of itself isn't considered uncivil. It can be hard to balance being predictable and using judgment. Blocked posters don't necessarily stay cool 100% of the time they're blocked. =NO CHANGE
>
> Swifter might be better in some ways, but deputies can't be here all the time. And it would give posters less time to apologize or otherwise work things out on their own, which I'd much prefer. REALLY, BOB, CAUSE THATS EXACTLY WHAT JUST HAPPENED TO ME AND I STILL HAD A 2WK BLOCKSORRY, AGAIN=NO CHANGE
>
> Under certain conditions, posters can already be asked not to post to certain other posters:
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#harassed
>
> I think it's nice when posters themselves replace hostility with politeness. Sometimes friendly input from other posters is more effective than input, no matter how friendly, from the administration.NO=CHANGE
>
> Again, be the change you wish to see. Show other posters how they might interpret things more charitably. Encourage them to apologize. Suggest they not address those they can't get along with. Help them avoid being blocked. A post in time saves nine.=NO CHANGE
>
> Bob"It takes two to tango"...(Fayeroe, out of context)
Bob:
"Hmm, and maybe in addition to hurt and anger, my unavailability also triggers longing?"
You did NOT just say that to Fayeroe. I think I just threw up in my mouth. Dude, you got issues.
-You implied that maybe greenleaf was looking to you to fulfil some kind of "Daddy Issues"?
Are you insane? No really. You are creeping me out. Does it trigger us when you aren't here? He*l no, don't you get it? It triggers us when EACH OTHER arent here.Go far far away Bob please. Just stop the blocks before you go. Bye Bye!
Jade***Jade***Jade***Jade***Jade***Jade***Jade****
Posted by Phillipa on April 5, 2009, at 21:45:59
In reply to Re: SUGGESTIONS-ANOTHER FALSE ALARM » Dr. Bob, posted by JadeKelly on April 5, 2009, at 21:35:53
Jade we straightened out our differences amongst ourselves so there is much merit to this. People get upset and get trigger fingers so give us time to work things out Dr. Bob please. Would hate to lose you Jade. Love Phillipa
Posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2009, at 22:48:08
In reply to Re: SUGGESTIONS » Dr. Bob, posted by myco on April 5, 2009, at 17:44:33
> So you don't ever feel that you are "babysitting" Bob?
No, I don't ever feel posters are babies.
> I agree it's good practice for people to readjust their communication skills to be polite and compassionate for others but also the others need to add to their own skills by learning to reinterpret or perceiving things said or done in a different light. My limited experience with therapy thus far includes this as a way of reducing added stress on oneself.
I agree, which is why one of my suggestions was to show other posters how they might interpret things more charitably.
Bob
Posted by Dr. Bob on April 6, 2009, at 17:01:33
In reply to Re: SUGGESTIONS-ANOTHER FALSE ALARM » Dr. Bob, posted by JadeKelly on April 5, 2009, at 21:35:53
Hi, everyone,
Would any of you be willing to try this out?
Show Jade how she might interpret things more charitably. Encourage her to apologize. Help her avoid being blocked.
> Bob:
>
> "Hmm, and maybe in addition to hurt and anger, my unavailability also triggers longing?"
>
> You did NOT just say that to Fayeroe. I think I just threw up in my mouth. Dude, you got issues.
>
> Are you insane? No really. You are creeping me out.
>
> JadeKellyBob
PS: From that other thread:
> > I really would like to talk to zazenducke
> >
> > Sigismund
>
> It takes two to tango...
>
> Hmm, and maybe in addition to hurt and anger, my unavailability also triggers longing?
>
> Bobhttp://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081228/msgs/883196.html
> It takes two to tango.
>
> fayeroehttp://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081228/msgs/883223.html
Posted by Garnet71 on April 6, 2009, at 17:38:32
In reply to Blocks, posted by verne on April 3, 2009, at 3:13:38
We could avoid a lot of blocks here if people would quit 'telling on' one another; in other words, if you feel hurt or slighted - maybe just let the perceived insulter know right away rather than hitting that notify adminstrator button. That creates a lot less friction than being told on like back in elementary school. I've done it myself when I thought someone was rude to me when I first came here - and vice versa when someone thought I was rude or inconsiderate to them - problems resolved; no blocking.
**How about make that a rule - let the posters resolve the problem on thier own, and if that doesn't work - then do your administrative stuff. That type of communication fosters relationships and is a lot healthier than having some "authority" intervene. It is a little strange since we are all adults here. In real life, we don't have some authority swoop down and make it all go away when their are frictions with work, family, friends - we must work things out on our own.*** See-that would be good thereuputic practice for us; problem resolution experience.
Jade, I had wondered why I haven't seen you around - you had a lot of good advice and support to offer, I hope you stick around.
Posted by Garnet71 on April 6, 2009, at 17:48:16
In reply to Blocks, posted by verne on April 3, 2009, at 3:13:38
"This is a message board for mutual support and education."
So it seems, Dr. Bob, this forum is more for members that it is for you. Lightening up a bit on the rules, such as letting people resolve their own problems (like apologizing to another, etc.) before doing administrative blocks, would be beneficial to the community because it would foster personal growth and social skills that are helpful in maintaining a supportive evironment.
This technique is more in line with your mission statements and forum purpose. The environment of 'walking on eggshells' that some have inadvertently described through many posts on this particular board is counterproductive to a supportive atmosphere.
Think about it.
Posted by garnet71 on April 6, 2009, at 18:08:17
In reply to Blocks, posted by verne on April 3, 2009, at 3:13:38
Okay-one more thing Dr. Bob - if you believe in utilizing the internet to solve problems - you would know current societal trends that are escalating and increasingly eminant, brought upon by technological communications, and you could either harness the trends or fall behind:
Heirarchy of organizations:
- moving from top down to bottom upOnline collaboration - the future in problem solving:
- moving from CONsumers to PROsumers (that would be us members)
If you recognize that - i'd say you're pretty up on your research in using technology in the realm of problem solving/support groups. You don't want to be outdated, do you? If you don't recognize those changes that are being facilitated via communication technologies at this very moment, then I might just have to compare you with a recent Dean of a local university who I met not too long ago who did not even know what the term "social entrepreneurship" meant and had to be taught about it by some sophomore undegrad student (me). Nothing personal!
Hope that's a convincing argument Z:)
Posted by myco on April 6, 2009, at 18:13:19
In reply to behind the times.?, posted by garnet71 on April 6, 2009, at 18:08:17
ooo Garnet71 youre just so sssthhexxayyyy when you talk logic. :o)
*hugs*
> Okay-one more thing Dr. Bob - if you believe in utilizing the internet to solve problems - you would know current societal trends that are escalating and increasingly eminant, brought upon by technological communications, and you could either harness the trends or fall behind:
>
> Heirarchy of organizations:
>
> - moving from top down to bottom up
>
> Online collaboration - the future in problem solving:
>
> - moving from CONsumers to PROsumers (that would be us members)
>
> If you recognize that - i'd say you're pretty up on your research in using technology in the realm of problem solving/support groups. You don't want to be outdated, do you? If you don't recognize those changes that are being facilitated via communication technologies at this very moment, then I might just have to compare you with a recent Dean of a local university who I met not too long ago who did not even know what the term "social entrepreneurship" meant and had to be taught about it by some sophomore undegrad student (me). Nothing personal!
>
> Hope that's a convincing argument Z:)
>
Posted by JadeKelly on April 6, 2009, at 18:51:01
In reply to Re: an opportunity, posted by Dr. Bob on April 6, 2009, at 17:01:33
I love you guys, but if ANYONE does this I swear I will find you!!!!! LOL!! Really, please don't.
Do not show me a dam* thing please. How dare him.
I have finally learned how to interpret exactly whats going on here.*****Please hear me****I am NOT coming back. He knows this. He is trying to control you and weild (in his own mind) power to punish me, by encouraging you to get me to apologize. For what? I meant EVERY word. Again, I meant every word. He can block me till the cows come home. I will not be back EVER. I will not ever apologize. I feel no "charity" towards bob.
I'm posting one last time because I will not stand back and watch him turn you into his puppets to punish me. Wish me luck if you want to, Phillipa has my email if you want it. I would love to hear from posters (only).
I am begging you do not respond to that garbage below. Bob is small and insecure. Let him get his jollies elsewhere. Maybe HE could be thinking about charity. How many weeks of blocking in the last few months? TwinLeaf?
Bob, immediately remove everyones blocks. YOU show some charity, bob. If I had my way everyone would stop posting until all blocked posters were pardoned. Charity? Lets see some Bob. And maybe a few apologies to them as well.
Love to posters, Jade
BLOCK AWAY BOB Its what you do best. In fact, just make it permanent please. Then I don't have to go to the trouble of unregistering.
****GARBAGE******GARBAGE****GARBAGE****GARBAGE****"Show Jade how she might interpret things more charitably. Encourage her to apologize. Help her avoid being blocked.-Bob
******GARBAGE****GARBAGE****GARBAGE******GARBAGE
Posted by myco on April 6, 2009, at 19:00:10
In reply to Re:********READ BEFORE POSTING**** PLEASE, posted by JadeKelly on April 6, 2009, at 18:51:01
lol Jade, we really must get you a date babe :oP
kiss it missy hehe
> I love you guys, but if ANYONE does this I swear I will find you!!!!! LOL!! Really, please don't.
>
> Do not show me a dam* thing please. How dare him.
> I have finally learned how to interpret exactly whats going on here.*****Please hear me****
>
> I am NOT coming back. He knows this. He is trying to control you and weild (in his own mind) power to punish me, by encouraging you to get me to apologize. For what? I meant EVERY word. Again, I meant every word. He can block me till the cows come home. I will not be back EVER. I will not ever apologize. I feel no "charity" towards bob.
>
> I'm posting one last time because I will not stand back and watch him turn you into his puppets to punish me. Wish me luck if you want to, Phillipa has my email if you want it. I would love to hear from posters (only).
>
> I am begging you do not respond to that garbage below. Bob is small and insecure. Let him get his jollies elsewhere. Maybe HE could be thinking about charity. How many weeks of blocking in the last few months? TwinLeaf?
>
> Bob, immediately remove everyones blocks. YOU show some charity, bob. If I had my way everyone would stop posting until all blocked posters were pardoned. Charity? Lets see some Bob. And maybe a few apologies to them as well.
>
> Love to posters, Jade
>
> BLOCK AWAY BOB Its what you do best. In fact, just make it permanent please. Then I don't have to go to the trouble of unregistering.
>
>
> ****GARBAGE******GARBAGE****GARBAGE****GARBAGE****
>
> "Show Jade how she might interpret things more charitably. Encourage her to apologize. Help her avoid being blocked.-Bob
>
> ******GARBAGE****GARBAGE****GARBAGE******GARBAGE
>
Posted by garnet71 on April 6, 2009, at 19:00:26
In reply to Re: behind the times.? » garnet71, posted by myco on April 6, 2009, at 18:13:19
Well, Myco, maybe everyone could use some
**sex and chocolate***
lol
Posted by myco on April 6, 2009, at 19:01:55
In reply to Re: behind the times.?, posted by garnet71 on April 6, 2009, at 19:00:26
ooo agreed. *rubs a lil logic on your nose*
> Well, Myco, maybe everyone could use some
>
> **sex and chocolate***
>
> lol
Posted by garnet71 on April 6, 2009, at 19:16:35
In reply to Re:********READ BEFORE POSTING**** PLEASE, posted by JadeKelly on April 6, 2009, at 18:51:01
Hi Jade!
I don't think anyone's going to try to shame you into submission.
But these strategies are not working, obviously.
Which is why....
~We need to initiate a shift in Dr. Bob's mind~
Out with the emotion and therapeutic connoctations!!..in with the reputation of Uni Chicago, Bob's research techniques and potential intellectual collaboration subsequently followed with ingenious problem solving made allowable from the modern works of Dr. Bob.!!
Bob-there is just toooo much intelluctual capacity and information out there - and the rate of information change to keep up with - for any TOP DOWN organizations to survive..in the near future.
Take notice~
You might want to read some of MIT's open courseware and see what's up with that.
And Bob, I know you have a sense of humor - maybe you could use some sex and chocolate too...lol
Silly mood lol
Posted by verne on April 6, 2009, at 20:19:08
In reply to Re:********READ BEFORE POSTING**** PLEASE, posted by JadeKelly on April 6, 2009, at 18:51:01
Good point, Jade.
The community is being asked to find ways to "encourage" you to apologize. That sounds like public SHAMING, remninsicent of the Puritan stocks.
Dr Bob invited people to "encourage" you to apologize. How is this different than public shaming? Is this a new experiment?
I'm so sick of a place run by someone so sick, he explains away a critical post as "longing" for him. How sick, how twisted, is that?
I guess I'll be blocked for another year for stating the obvious. But I'm so tired of this place and have lost all respect for Dr Bob. Many would say he's a pissant, but I would be more charitable and say he's got a big ego and a raging inferority complex, along with a tiny heart and shriveled soul.
Sadly, an egocentric weasel has been running this site and abusing posters for years. Sometimes with tragic results.
Verne
Posted by fayeroe on April 6, 2009, at 20:35:22
In reply to Shaming the Poster » JadeKelly, posted by verne on April 6, 2009, at 20:19:08
My first thought when I read the "helpful" post was "how horribly embarrassing for Jade".....it reminds me of a preschool teacher that I saw recently. Her first attempt to get the child to apologize for hitting his playmate didn't work so she turned the shame on him. (These were three year olds..my grandson's class)
Shame is a sham.
Posted by zenhussy on April 6, 2009, at 20:37:06
In reply to Shaming the Poster » JadeKelly, posted by verne on April 6, 2009, at 20:19:08
Posted by Phillipa on April 6, 2009, at 20:39:46
In reply to Shaming the Poster » JadeKelly, posted by verne on April 6, 2009, at 20:19:08
Since some are new posters and may not frequent this board it has been discussed various time by blocked posters and others when they come back. They the posters have asked how to avoid this again in the future. A Civility buddy was suggested and many liked this. Someone to help interpret the rules. I'd be more than willing to Be Jade's civility buddy. Yes We did make up on our own and agree since some don't read board daily give a bit of time for the cooling down period and see what happens. Also I don't feel that Dr. Bob is asking for an apology to him but the those who might have been offended. If I'm wrong Dr Bob will post this. I'd also like to see Jade stay. She can be funny and whitty. We all have good and bad days. I used to be amazed at how we ended up apologizing or rewording things to each other on the meds board. This was before the notification system and sometimes no one saw the post til the posters had apologized so no one ended up being blocke. So if notification button used maybe write is there a way for you two to work things out first? So hard to write correctly. Love Phillipa
Posted by verne on April 6, 2009, at 20:43:26
In reply to Re: No please read, posted by Phillipa on April 6, 2009, at 20:39:46
Posted by Dr. Bob on April 6, 2009, at 22:12:39
In reply to xox 4 being true to yourselves and others-jade n' (nm) » verne, posted by zenhussy on April 6, 2009, at 20:37:06
> We could avoid a lot of blocks here if people would quit 'telling on' one another; in other words, if you feel hurt or slighted - maybe just let the perceived insulter know right away rather than hitting that notify adminstrator button.
As long as you let them know in a civil way...
> ~We need to initiate a shift in Dr. Bob's mind~
>
> Bob-there is just toooo much intelluctual capacity and information out there - and the rate of information change to keep up with - for any TOP DOWN organizations to survive..in the near future.Focusing on me is itself top-down...
> How about make that a rule - let the posters resolve the problem on thier own, and if that doesn't work - then do your administrative stuff.
>
> Garnet71It seems not to be working this time...
> The community is being asked to find ways to "encourage" you to apologize. That sounds like public SHAMING, remninsicent of the Puritan stocks.
>
> Verne> xox 4 being true to yourselves and others
>
> zenhussyAnd it seems one reason posters may not resolve problems on their own is that apologizing may be seen as shameful or not being true to oneself.
Which means being blocked may be seen as a sign of being true to oneself and something to feel proud of. I guess it's not surprising if posters don't readily let go of something that makes them feel good.
So no one's going to try to help Jade and now Verne avoid being blocked? Because that wouldn't feel supportive?
Bob
--
> I would ... say he's got a big ego and a raging inferority complex, along with a tiny heart and shriveled soul.
>
> Sadly, an egocentric weasel has been running this site and abusing posters for years. Sometimes with tragic results.
>
> Verne
Posted by Sigismund on April 6, 2009, at 22:33:38
In reply to Re: an opportunity, posted by Dr. Bob on April 6, 2009, at 22:12:39
>So no one's going to try to help Jade and now Verne avoid being blocked? Because that wouldn't feel supportive?
I doubt that it is quite like that. This debate has become divisive. The point at which it did so was perhaps when those ill-judged psychotherapeutic type comments were taken badly. A lot of what you otherwise said made sense.... 'Be the change you want to see' and so on.
Posted by zenhussy on April 6, 2009, at 22:42:20
In reply to Re: an opportunity, posted by Dr. Bob on April 6, 2009, at 22:12:39
>>>I guess it's not surprising if posters don't readily let go of something that makes them feel good.<<<
Maybe it's not surprising if administrators don't readily let go of something that makes them feel good?
>>>So no one's going to try to help Jade and now Verne avoid being blocked? Because that wouldn't feel supportive?
Bob<<<
So no one's going to try to help Dr. Bob avoid being [....]? Because that wouldn't feel supportive?
Posted by myco on April 6, 2009, at 23:20:44
In reply to Blocks, posted by verne on April 3, 2009, at 3:13:38
This is become worn out. *wonders how long such battle has been raging on this board and in the minds of those here for ages* This is a very old issue i'm guessing based on the passion in which some people express themselves with...there seems to be no passion from admin side at all...why I dont know.
Seems also that it's getting nowhere. An exercise in futility. Admin seems to just turn things right back around - attempting to match anything said by posters on the opposing side. Like a chess game but in a perpetual state of stalemate.
I do wonder if this is not a game from the admin side as it seems to be from one perspective. Questions are only responded to in part and presented, often, in such a way as to show vagueness or to counteract anything said in argument. Nothing has been accomplished here at all and something tells me nothing will. It seems logic is only comming from the posters side...issues need to be properly addressed to solve this and their needs to be a "settlement" based on negotiation.
In then end this middle ground is not going to be achieved. Remember this site is a "study" folks...an exercise for Bob in his academic life. I don't quite know how it fits into academics but I know he teaches or talks on this very subject...the internet and its use for therapy etc. So it is totally reasonable to think that there are "games" being played here. We are, by the way - to some extent, being observed here. How can you not see that? This whole site is designed as a tool...we are the pieces on the board of the game...the pawns, the rooks, the kings and queens.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.