Re: part-whole relations

Posted by Estella on May 8, 2006, at 3:57:07

In reply to Re: part-whole relations, posted by Estella on May 8, 2006, at 3:33:09

> actually... i guess G does change...
> it is the time slices that don't change
Actually... I'm not so sure... I'm not so sure what to say about that.
A - B - C - D - E - F
And the sum total of that = G
Does G change through time?
G just is the totality of slices.
Does G change through time?
Time slices change...
Each individual time slice doesn't...
But there are alterations in properties between time slices.
I guess you can say that the object changes at different points in time.
But G isn't located in any one point in time.
I'm not sure why I heard someone say that 4D objects aren't supposed to change...
I don't know.
I think this line is supposed to be an attempt at a solution of paradoxes around
Changing
and
Not changing
too
But I'm not sure...
And on this account how many ships of Thesus are there?
Ak.

Thread

z... talk to me... 838 3/9/06
...
Re: Venus calling zeugma 4/25/06
Re: Venus calling » zeugma Estella 5/7/06
Re: Venus calling » Estella zeugma 5/7/06
Re: Venus calling » zeugma zeugma 5/7/06
with reference to wildcard zeugma 5/7/06
part-whole relations zeugma 5/7/06
Re: part-whole relations Estella 5/7/06
Re: part-whole relations » Estella zeugma 5/7/06
Re: part-whole relations zeugma 5/7/06
Re: part-whole relations » zeugma Estella 5/8/06
Re: part-whole relations Estella 5/8/06
Re: part-whole relations Estella 5/8/06
Re: part-whole relations Estella 5/8/06
Re: part-whole relations Estella 5/8/06
Re: part-whole relations Estella 5/8/06
Re: part-whole relations Estella 5/8/06
z agent858 6/4/06
strange meeting » agent858 zeugma 6/15/06

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Estella thread:618106
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/write/20060331/msgs/641212.html

	for
in