Posted by zenhussy on December 17, 2005, at 15:04:57
In reply to Re: Thanks, but... » pseudoname, posted by alexandra_k2 on December 16, 2005, at 15:48:10
pseudoname>>> Another person edited most of my stuff out and put in a LOT of other stuff, mostly about how deceptively & poorly & unethically (in his opinion) Dr Bob runs this forum.
alexandra_k2>> Ah. There are a few disgruntled peoples who have been blocked for lengthy periods of time...
alex,
why disgruntled? why blocked?
could it not be possible that current posters have opinions that differ from yours and other "pro-babblers"?
curious as to how ppl come to the conclusions they do.
many ppl who currently post and are not blocked have written strong opinions regarding this site over time in many places.
would you call someone who was upset at the harm suffered at the hands of public medicine who was now speaking out to the world about their mistreatment disgruntled? or would you call that person an advocate? how about victim? what about whistleblower? muckraker? people who've suffered at the hands of medical professionals would probably hear the message of that person loud and clear and support that message. people in public health would probably not share that opinion and could instead think of that person as a naysayer, troublemaker, etc.
it all depends on what each person has experienced in their lives.
many sides to this story from many participants. some people play guessing games with innuendoes that slide periously close to what is allowable ......could it be one of them that is playing both sides? for best role portraying both the devil's advocate and the babble darling......the Oscar® goes to........
interesting information provided by many sources.......we'd think of wiki like a supermarket version of an encyclopedia......flashy, attention grabbing but not necessarily the best source for in depth information.
poster:zenhussy
thread:588307
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/write/20051205/msgs/589802.html