Posted by alexandra_k on February 9, 2022, at 12:36:03
In reply to the nz government used pacifists..., posted by alexandra_k on February 9, 2022, at 12:22:30
i mean, you can read the judgments of the courts that were delivered to me.
i can supply the evidence that they blatantly refused to accept or acknowledge.
they make a number of false assertions. inaccuracies of fact.
they ignore half the laws.
they engage in dubious reasoning.
i don't think that anybody competent would read the judgments and think that justice has been done.
i think that competent people would read the judgments and think it blindlingly obvious that justice does not live here.
____
the courts granted me waiver of filing fee for me to file... let's see... no less than 5 cases... on grounds that i am in receipt of supported living payment.
then all of a sudden the courts refuse to accept that i am in receipt of supported living payment so as to reject my filing and say that i have abandoned the case because i did not pay the required filing fee.
i have filed everything that needs to be filed for the court of appeal for every case to be heard on appeal.
the courts have refused to accept the filings on the grounds that i have not paid more than $20,000 security for costs and filing fees that they demand i pay else the cases will not progress.
in other words, they demand i pay more than $20,000 else i am forced to abandon the cases.
they know i am in receipt of supported living payment but they refuse to accept the evidence of that, now.
they have delivered previous judgements that are blatantly incompetent (with respect to their aim being to administer justice in a timely fashion and their aim not being to delay and confuse and prevent and prohbit justice being done).
___
i delivered to the courts evidence of my being involuntarily detained unlawfully and drugged unlawfully by the auckland district health board.
they did not fill out the paperwork to hold me. they informed me that i was required to stay 'voluntarily' and they refused to allow me to leave. they themselves admit they had no grounds to section me to stay beyond an initial 5 day observation. but they refused to allow me to leave.
insofar as i can tell they did this solely to demonstrate their power. how there would be no consequences for them and there would be absolutely nothing that i could do about it.
the courts now document how much money they are going to bill me for having brought the issue of my being involuntarily detained and unlawfully drugged to the attenetion of the courts.
i took the issue to the law firm that has the monopoly on prosecution. that is to say they are the only firm in auckland who is allowed to prosecute cases for the government. they informed me they were 'conflicted out' of prosecuting anything within the health system.
the government then said that that must be because th firm was confused about whether i wanted them to initiate civil vs criminal proceedings against teh health system.
___
i'm not confused.
it's pretty f*ck*ng clear what's going on here.
we are not a developed nation, at all.
nobody home.
nothing here.
nada. zip. zilch. zero.
detention camp island.
by choice. the choice our leaders chose.
trading away the health of the people. etc.
the education.
f*ck*ng farce of a country.
poster:alexandra_k
thread:1118511
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20210821/msgs/1118512.html