Posted by Lou Pilder on May 21, 2015, at 9:18:14
In reply to Re: correction- Scott thanking God for drug treatments » Lamdage22, posted by SLS on May 21, 2015, at 0:26:44
> > You thank god for psychiatric medication yet you are still desperate enough to have holes and electrodes drilled into your skull? DBS?
> >
> > With all due respect, that doesnt make any sense.
>
> Drugs help me enough so as to allow me to shop for food and pay bills. They allow me to live independently. I do not take this good fortune for granted. Included in my praise of God and psychotropics is their success in bring many other people into remission and the ability to achieve mental health and work towards happiness. However, it might be time for me to more vigorously pursue brain stumulation techniques, which include magnetic and direct current treatments. My brain is adept at reacting to positive drug responses with tachyphylaxis. Perhaps the combination of pharmacological and tissue stimulation would work for me.
>
> I know that you have had your disappointments with psychotropic drug treatments. Since I don't know the details of your symptomatology and treatment history, it is difficult to offer suggestions that might renew your hopes for treatment success. For every new drug that becomes available, a certain percentage of previously treatment-resistent people will go on to respond well to it. I'm waiting for cariprazine to become available. It works like Abilify, but is stronger at D3 receptors in the limbic system. I am hoping that this translates into a more robust antidpessant effect.
>
>
> - ScottFriends,
The poster writes that he praises a God for psychotropic drugs. Yet today, the God in question is not specified.
This could seriously mislead you to think that the God that the poster is praising is the God that The Jews, Christians and Islamic people give service and worship to. You see, the character of that God is revealed in the scriptures that the Jews and Christians and Islamic people use. And I am prevented by the prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung to post my own repudiation here if the poster ever identifies the God that he is using in reference to being thanked by him for psychotropic drugs. Since he is allowed to evade my request to identify which God he is referring to, I do not have the opportunity to post what has been revealed to me until I know which God he is using to give thanks to for psychotropic drugs.
Now be it as it may be, the God could be the God that the Jews worship. And since I am prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post my own repudiation to the statement if the God in question is that God, then the policy here is against the Jew, which makes the policy an anti-Semitic policy that could lead readers to think that this is an anti-Semitic community by the nature that the leader's policy is to prohibit a Jew from having equal protection of the rules because the poster is not required to identify the God that he is using to thank for mind-altering drugs prescribed by a psychiatrist so that readers could think that the poster is using the God that the Jews worship as his subject God.
By the poster being allowed to evade my request for identification here, Jews and Christians and Islamic people could feel insulted an humiliated to see that the God in question could be that God since it is not specified otherwise, for there could be a subset of Jews and others that have been revealed as to the character of the God that they worship to be different from the God that the poster alludes to without identifying and the statement is allowed here to be seen as supportive which could lead a Jew to feel put down.
Since the policy here is that I am prohibited by Mr. Hsiung from posting from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me, and the God in question could be the God that the Jews worship, the policy here is against the Jew which makes the policy an ant-Semitic policy and by extension the community could be deemed by a subset of readers to be an anti-Semitic community because of that.
If Scott ever identifies which God he is using here in his posts, then readers could know as to if he is using the God that the Jews worship or not. That IMHHHO could be supportive, and being supportive takes precedence here. In my thinking, being evasive is not being supportive, yet it is allowed here. If it was not allowed, then I think that lives could be saved, life-ruining conditions and addictions could be prevented. That is supportive in any community unless the community believes that death is supportive.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1078452
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20150214/msgs/1079125.html