Posted by Lou Pilder on September 5, 2010, at 20:09:19
In reply to Re: lower block length, posted by Dr. Bob on September 5, 2010, at 19:39:51
> > It was some time since the original post was made, with no further uncivil posts. Might it be possible to put a lower block length if the original poster effectively ceased and desisted after an intervention?
> >
> > Dinah
>
> > I agree...
> >
> > muffled
>
> Would you have preferred a shorter block? Or no block at all?
>
> BobMr Hsiung,
My view is that there are issues here that have me lean to a {no block} at all here. The reasons are that I am the person that the post in question was about and that the poster asked where I was. That part of the post was satified because I am who I am and I'm here where I'm at. So there is no harm in that part of the post.
The other aspect here is that the poster was directed to rephrase the other part. I posted that to rephrase means to rewrite the statement in question to be clearer. I can not understand how the statement in question could be any clearer, for it was what it was, so IMHO the poster could have been left with no remedy to comply to rephrase for it is what it is.
Not being able to comply IMO is analogous to having to be two places at the same time. Thearfore, I think that a dismissal of this is the logical remedy.
But then there is the issue of that I am the person as the subject. After reviewing the facts, I now lean to that the statement is not so much an accusation, but something else that belongs on the psychology board for discussion.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20100706/msgs/954593.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:960581
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20100806/msgs/961416.html