Posted by rainbowbrite on October 2, 2005, at 10:39:31
In reply to :-) » rainbowbrite, posted by alexandra_k on October 2, 2005, at 10:13:06
hmm this one was difficult. But I got...
There was no inconsistency in the way that you responded to the questions in this activity. You indicated that an act can be wrong even if it is entirely private and no one, not even the person doing the act, is harmed by it. There is nothing contradictory then in a claim that the actions depicted in these scenarios are morally problematic.
But I took it twice and from my psychological approach I scored very differnet....There was no inconsistency in the way that you responded to the questions in this activity. You did not evaluate the actions depicted in these scenarios to be across the board wrong. And anyway you indicated that an action can be wrong even if it is entirely private and no one, not even the person doing the act, is harmed by it. So, in fact, had you thought that the acts described here were entirely wrong there would still be no inconsistency in your moral outlook.
poster:rainbowbrite
thread:561841
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20050929/msgs/561900.html