Re: Michael Jackson??? » Dinah

Posted by used2b on April 13, 2005, at 22:38:59

In reply to Re: Michael Jackson??? » used2b, posted by Dinah on April 13, 2005, at 7:37:00

> Well, that's good, right? Because if you saw the names, then I was violating my own principles.

It seems consistent with your principals, yes.
And thanks, because though I might be interested in more details about which witnesses have been identified by what organization, I really didn't want to read the names here.

Thread

Michael Jackson??? Spriggy 4/11/05
...
Re: Don't post to X/ I haven't seen the first request » used2b partlycloudy 4/12/05
Re: Michael Jackson??? » Mark H. Susan47 4/12/05
Re: Michael Jackson??? GUILTY » annierose Susan47 4/12/05
Re: Michael Jackson??? GUILTY Susan47 4/12/05
Re: I Regret My Previous Post Mark H. 4/12/05
Re: I Regret My Previous Post Susan47 4/12/05
Re: 2nd request - please do not post to me. » partlycloudy Larry Hoover 4/12/05
Re: Michael Jackson??? » used2b Dinah 4/12/05
Re: Michael Jackson??? » Dinah used2b 4/13/05
Re: Michael Jackson??? » used2b Dinah 4/13/05
Re: Michael Jackson??? used2b 4/13/05
Re: Michael Jackson??? » used2b Dinah 4/13/05
Re: Michael Jackson??? » Dinah used2b 4/13/05
Re: I Regret My Previous Post Susan47 4/17/05

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:used2b thread:482913
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20050408/msgs/483956.html

	for
in