Posted by wittgensteinz on October 4, 2010, at 11:56:30
In reply to Re: Dreams, posted by emmanuel98 on September 30, 2010, at 19:20:25
> I think standard interpretations of dreams is mostly bunk. Dreams are sometimes meaningful to the dreamer, sometimes not. When I bring a dream in, it's usually a dream that is meaningful to me and usually, I can figure out the meaning. If I am unsure, my T says, what do you think that means? I know best how I felt after a dream, whether it woke me and upset me, whether it's content was obvious (like most anxiety dreams).
I think that's the thing I've been having trouble with - the idea of dreams having a subjective meaning to the dreamer is easy to accept but that dreams might have objective symbols that stand true regardless of the dreamer is far more problematic.
Witti
poster:wittgensteinz
thread:964273
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20100831/msgs/964676.html