Posted by pulse on June 25, 2006, at 6:41:07 [reposted on June 26, 2006, at 0:56:22 | original URL]
In reply to Re: Boards » pulse, posted by Donna Louise on June 25, 2006, at 5:08:33
Donna,
it's obvious you're highly intuitive.
< Or girl that has also been around the block a few times? Similar history thing. >
of the 2, it HAS to be the above 1!
believe it or not, i was as far way from a tomboy as could be; prissy little thing, but likely due to being an only child, was also always the natural leader w/ all my little friends.
i've 1 email addy & i've also used same - 'msprs' - at some net forums - as a joke on myself.
alot of my former men problems have to do with this: i look very feminine, even w/ no makeup or other 'accessories', so not a thing i can do about, not that i feel i should. contrasted with:
i'm as opposite as could be, far as the true nature i almost always show, if not immediately, then, just a very short way down road.
when i told my ex this theory, he commented simply, 'ya think? '
thank you,
pulse
poster:pulse
thread:661472
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20060623/msgs/661495.html