Posted by Lou Pilder on February 19, 2009, at 6:30:11
In reply to Reminder - 3-consecutive thread guideline » fayeroe, posted by Deputy 10derHeart on February 17, 2009, at 23:10:35
> Dr. Bob asks the following of us all:
>
> "Please share this site with others by not starting more than 3 consecutive threads on the same board or posting more than 3 consecutive follow-ups in the same thread."
>
> I believe this is the fifth consecutive thread.
>
> I will state, just for "the record," that I don't personally agree the community needs this particular prohibition. But, Dr. Bob has decided to keep the rule in place for now. Since that's the reality, as a deputy I'll continue to remind posters of his wishes. This may or may not be because it has been reported. This may or may not be because a deputy happens to notice the number of threads. Of course, sometimes we don't notice.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- 10derHeart, acting as deputy to Dr. Bob
>
To the administrator,
You wrote,[...I don't..agree (that) the community needs (the 3 consecutive thread rule)...]
I am unsurer as to what your rationale could be for posting that statement here. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. Could you list here any criteria that you think were those that formed your thinking that causes you to not agree that the commiunity needs the rule in question? If not, could you post here why not?
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:880482
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20081212/msgs/881030.html