Re: I don't think so...

Posted by Jakeman on March 20, 2006, at 21:16:30

In reply to Re: I don't think so... » caraher, posted by AuntieMel on March 20, 2006, at 10:48:28

> What you posted wasn't 'against' anything. It was 'for' something.
>
> To quote the doctor:
>
> "That's the idea, be pro-something. Instead of being anti-something bad, be pro-something better."
>
The problem comes in when you try to talk about a signee to this agreement that has violated it.
warm regards, Jake

Thread

Is this uncivil? caraher 3/20/06
Re: I don't think so... » caraher AuntieMel 3/20/06
Re: I don't think so... Jakeman 3/20/06

Post a new follow-up

[622653]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Jakeman thread:622416
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20060304/msgs/622653.html

	for
in