clarification on leadership participation » kiddo

Posted by jane d on February 10, 2002, at 22:30:52

In reply to Re: Leaders should also be participants » jane d, posted by kiddo on February 10, 2002, at 22:06:40

Kiddo,
I'm sorry. I wasn't very clear at all. What I meant to say was if the very idea of discussing a certain book or type of book left you cold it should be avoided. For example, if you felt that there was no point in discussing non-fiction I'd rather see the group discussing fiction and have your participation than discuss a non fiction book in which your only involvement was to tell people when to start or end discussions. Is that any clearer?
Jane

Thread

Leadership role ST 2/7/02
Re: Leadership role Dr. Bob 2/7/02
Re: Leadership role » Dr. Bob jay 2/8/02
Re: Leadership role fi 2/8/02
Re: Leadership role Dr. Bob 2/8/02
Entertaining Fiction » fi jane d 2/8/02
Re: Entertaining Fiction Noa 2/8/02
Re: Leadership role kiddo 2/8/02
Re: Leadership role Dr. Bob 2/8/02
Leaders should also be participants jane d 2/10/02
Re: Leaders should also be participants » jane d kiddo 2/10/02
clarification on leadership participation » kiddo jane d 2/10/02
Yup :-) (nm) kiddo 2/10/02
Re: Entertaining Fiction fi 2/13/02
Re: Entertaining Fiction Fi 2/13/02
Re: Entertaining Fiction » Fi noa 2/13/02
Re: Entertaining Fiction Noa 2/14/02
Re: Entertaining Fiction anniebananie 2/16/02
Rotating genres » anniebananie jane d 2/21/02
Re: Rotating genres I agree (nm) kiddo 2/21/02
Re: Leadership roles decided: kiddo and jay Dr. Bob 2/26/02

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:jane d thread:12
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/books/20020206/msgs/61.html

	for
in