Posted by Dr. Bob on October 15, 2014, at 12:40:51
In reply to Re: SLS: How long?, posted by SLS on September 6, 2014, at 13:52:01
> 1. If you agree that there are posts in the archives that are identified by Lou Pilder as being prejudicial, why have you not edited the archives to reflect the appropriate sanctions to be placed on these posts?
>
> 2. If you do not agree that such posts exist, where might I find verbiage by you that asserts this fact.My policy is not to sanction archived posts. I'd prefer to focus on the present (and the future).
> 3. Will you make any changes to this website's FAQ to reflect that which you have learned during your discourse with Lou Pilder?
What a job that would be, to articulate what I've learned here. :-)
Bob
a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind -- The New York Times
backpedals well -- PartlyCloudy
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:1070482
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1072308.html