Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: The Hsiung-Pilder discussion

Posted by Dr. Bob on July 2, 2014, at 1:45:54

In reply to Lou's reply- The Hsiung-Pilder discussion-itzpsoez » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on July 1, 2014, at 7:06:21

> A. What is your rationale for not attending to the statement when it was posted before it was archived, if you have one.

No one (except maybe you) notified me of it.

> B. Would you be willing to post your archives of notifications so that readers could have that information to make their own determination as to why you did not post your tag-line to "Please be civil" before it was archived?

No, they're not public.

> C. You have posted a type of repudiation to posts that were archived in this discussion already. What is the difference, if any, between those and the one that calls me a disturbed person?

Which ones were the other ones, could you remind me?

> D. Would you agree that since you agree that what has happened with just that post, that you could be seen by a subset of readers to be wanting to allow hatred posted against me to stand as that since the statement is not sanctioned, readers could think that it is not against your rules and they could think that you are ratifying the libel?

Yes, that could happen.

> E. Would you be willing to treat that statement in the same manner as the ones that you have already posted some sort of repudiation to as seen on the top of the faith board

No, I see the FAQ as sufficient for other boards.

--

> I do not have any recollection of you striking any rules from your TOS here.

I don't believe I did.

> What stands that I know of, and then others could also know of, is that posters are to be civil at all times

Yes.

> and that you do not wait to sanction a statement that could put down/accuse another because one match could start a forest fire,

That used to be my policy, but I don't think that's in the FAQ.

> and that you have a notification policy that you will act upon those notifications

Yes.

> but that you give yourself the option to act on my notifications or not because it will be good for you ... to ignore my pleas ...

I give myself the options of acting and not acting on all notifications.

--

> > C. The new policy is:______________________

I was recently reminded of a policy that I like:

> > See everything; turn a blind eye to much; correct a little.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/12/23/131223fa_fact_carroll

Bob


a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind -- The New York Times
backpedals well -- PartlyCloudy


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dr. Bob thread:1050116
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1067762.html