Posted by Lou Pilder on June 27, 2014, at 12:09:07 [reposted on June 28, 2014, at 22:07:08 | original URL]
In reply to Re: yes please, me, too » 10derheart, posted by Dinah on June 27, 2014, at 10:48:40
> Ok then. I'd prefer never to be able to post here and not have to read about Lou's anxiety that I foster anti semetism.
>
> Dr Bob can word it however he likes.
>
> Of course what I'll get is never posting here *and* reading Lou's anxieties about my willful fostering of anti semetism.
>
> At least when I left a church because they prayed over me after I stood up against the idea of replacement theology, they likely forgot all about me. So I get prayed over as a heretic by a fairly progressive Christian church for standing up for Judaism. And made the object of anxiety on a consistent basis on babble for fostering anti semetism.
>
> It is a wonder-full world.Friends,
It is written here,[...willful fostering of anti sem(i)tism...].
Let us look at this post:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20131217/msgs/1060690.html
Now it is also written here that notifications go to all of the deputies and that any reply is to be considered to come from all of them, even if there is no reply, for no reply is a reply that has great significance. It could be indifference or it could be deliberate indifference. Readers could make up their own mind about which to choose.
But Mr. Hsiung states that he responds to notifications but gives himself the option to respond or not to mine. He says that it will be good for him and the community as a whole to not respond to those requests from me that can be seen openly and in the reminders posted by me and in other cases that can not be seen, yet.
In order for that to be carried out here, the deputies would also havde to ignore my requests and notifications or else Mr Hsiung could not leave my requests outstanding because a deputy could also respond to a notification {if they wanted to}.
This is the crux of one of the issues here, which is,{why are there years of outstanding notifications before Mr. Hsiung says that he revised his own policy?, (secretly because there is not a post alerting readers to such a change in policy by him before he did it). There could be a subset of jurists that consider what he has done in regards to his policy as constituting {ex-post facto) for malicious reasons carried out by his deputies of record. And those same set of jurists could think that the reason is to foster and develop and encourage anti-Semitic hate to be posted here and be allowed to not be processed by his own policy to post his tag-line to be civil and post what rule is broken. Instead, being left to stand without the tag-line to be civil posted to the statement in the thread where it is posted means that he does not consider those anti-Semitic statements to be against his rules.
But I see it and others could see it also. And we as a people could go to The Promised Land because it is promised to us and no person, even a psychiatrist and his deputies allowing the statement to be seen as civil here that {No non-Christian will enter heaven} will replace that covenant to the Jews from the God that they cherish and give service and worship to.
And for all of you that want to leave because I am trying to bring those that had a hand in leaving anti-Semitic statements here to be seen as supportive to post a repudiation to that kind of hate, I say to you that we as a people will sit down with Abraham Issac and Jacob in The Kingdom of God and dwell in the house of the Lord forever and your leaving anti-Semitic hate here to be seen as will be good for this community as a whole could find yourselves in the same fate as your predecessors that promulgated the same hate.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1067567
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1067571.html