Posted by Lou Pilder on April 13, 2013, at 9:44:58
In reply to Re: Lou's request -whtduzbzmehn? » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on December 24, 2010, at 7:47:30
> > If you think that it is, and there are people here that are threatening suicide, and could have the potential IMHO to then die as a result of a notification being outstanding, what could be your rationale for thinking that leaving the notification outstanding for that time period be supportive?
>
> Are you saying that should be Dr. Bob's basis of moderating? I don't think that would be fair to those not threatening suicide. Not responding to a notification isn't polite, no matter whether the notifier is threatening suicide or not. Not responding doesn't cause anyone to commit suicide, either. Dr. Bob is responsible for Dr. Bob's actions. Posters are responsible for their own.
>
> BTW, I also have an outstanding notification.D,
You wrote,
[...not responding does not cause anyone to commit suicide...].
I have a great amount of good research that could show otherwise. If you have some good research concerning your claim here, could you post a link to such? You see, when requests for clarification and such remain outstanding here, the readers that are interested in Mr Hsiung's response, and one does not come forward to be posted by him, then a lot of psychological/emotional aspects to the outstanding requests(s) could come into play in the one contemplating to kill themselves. This involves what psychologists write about in relation to what is {unresolved} and why Mr Hsiung has not posted a reply to my notifications and requests that can produce what is a result of what remains unresolved. You see, could the {unresolved}, in and of itself, become a catalyst to propel one to commit suicide to those in a mind-altered state of confusion from the psychotropic drugs that they are taking in collaboration with a psychiatrist/doctor?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:970300
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1042104.html