Posted by Lou PIlder on February 21, 2013, at 21:11:46
In reply to Re: Scott's Reminder. » SLS, posted by CamW on February 20, 2013, at 11:10:17
> > > On second thought Scott, you are correct. This is not my battle to fight.
> >
> > Of course it is, Cam. If any and all statements made by posters were to remain unchallenged, how would that affect the health of the individual and the viability of the community? I try to choose my battles strategically so as to remain focused and conserve time and energy. I have discovered that with some people, it is not necessary nor desirable to contest every word written.
> >
> > A poster recently asserted that an individual does not have to read his posts if they don't want to. However, this does not give him license to write anything he wants. After all, no one really has to read the words of Jean-Jacques Rousseau if they don't want to, right?
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Scott - After my time with mental health, I kinda lost it. But one cannot go from reading 10+ journal articles daily to doing nothing. I started studying textual criticism of the bible (yes, including trying to learn some ancient Greek... that is another story). I now own close to 100 scholarly texts on the subject (found a used bookstore that specializes) & have studied them all.
>
> Anyway, going through some posts that I missed while away from this site, I found some glaring errors by a poster.
>
> Unfortunately, for all of us, it is best if I stick to psychopharmacology.
>
> Re: Jean-Jacques Rousseau - Didn't he lose his just before the French Revolution? He was a Calvinist Freemason who believed the myth of the "Noble Savage". Read his "Discourse on Inequality" a while back, but it didn't leave much of an impression, but I see what you mean.
>
> Thanks Scott - CamC,
I am unsure as to what ou are identifying in what you wrote above. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have te opprotunity to respond accordingly.
A. In that you wrote that you read 10+ journal articles daily and that you started reading textual criticisms of the bible and that you own close to 100 scholerly texts on the subject,
1. Are the 10+ journal articles that you read daily the same as the textual criticisms of the bible?
2.in that you own close to 100 scholerly texts on the subject, what is the subject(s)?
3. What is a textual criticism?
B. In that you read posts in the archives and you say you have found errors by a poster,
1.who is the poster?
2. What are the errors
3. Why are they errors?
C. Why is it unfortuant if you stick to pharmacology and that it is for {all} of us and why is it {best}?
D. In your statement concerning JJ Rousseau, what is it that you see as to that you wrote, [...I see what you mean...]?
Lou
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:1038236
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1038628.html