Posted by Lou Pilder on June 18, 2012, at 13:21:30
In reply to Re: Lou's response-pshapoart » Lou Pilder, posted by Phillipa on June 17, 2012, at 21:15:51
> Lou if babble closes it's gone never to return and with it your and I'm sure other's requests. So that would be it. No answers to your outstanding requests. Will this cause you to be personally harmed? Phillipa
Phillipa,
You wrote,[...no answers to your outstanding requests...cause you to be..harmed?...].
If the archives are not able to be actuated in a closure, there are still the posts that are in other sites that were typed out, not in a link.
Then there could be a site that has all of the posts, such as the wayback machine.
You see, Mr. Hsiung has made prohibitions to me here that prevent me from posting my response to the posts in question. One way that I am prevented from posting my response is that I have requests to him that if they were responded to, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. You see, if there is not a response posted, then my opportunity to respond is not available, for I need to know what is unknown to be able to reveal what is not visible. I can post to what is seen. So not untill I can see it, could I know it. Other posters here also do not have to post answers to requests to them to clarify what they wrote, which also can prevent me from posting a response to what they wrote, if I have requests to them to clarify what they wrote.
The idea of what support is comes into play here, for Mr. Hsiung's TOS states that support takes precedence. I took him at his word in all of his rules here and what he has posted about his thinking, in particular that he states that in his thinking he does what will be good for this community as a whole. The historical paralles to that type of thinking go back before 1933, but there are other prohibitions to me here from Mr. Hsiung that could prevent me from posting here the response to him that I would like to. You see, is not the fact that there are requests from me to Mr Hsiung that are outstanding for days, weeks months and years thearfore could have the potential for some others to think, by his TOS, that those requests/notifications left outstanding will be good for this community as a whole? And if anyone could think that, could that thearfore put Jews at risk to being victims of antisemitic violence, or victims of bullies in schools, or shot at by those in a drug induced state that may have visited here and saw those type of statements being allowed to stand which IMHHHO could arouse antisemitic feelings and give some a (false) feeling of superiority toward Jews and target a Jew for murder? Has not the historical record shown this to happen when a leader of a community allows statement to stand that could arouse antisemitic feelings? This is one reason why I ask him to post his rationales. If he did, then I think that I could respond here like you have never seen, and (redacted by respondent).
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1019803
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1019888.html