Posted by Lou Pilder on October 30, 2010, at 16:05:02 [reposted on November 1, 2010, at 1:23:28 | original URL]
In reply to Lou's reply- » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on October 30, 2010, at 13:37:14
> > > Here is a site that includes some of what I am prohibited from posting here
> >
> > If you're prohibited from posting something here, please don't post how to find it elsewhere.
> >
> > But please don't take this personally, this doesn't mean I don't like you or think you're a bad person, and I'm sorry if this hurts you.
> >
> > More information about posting policies is in the FAQ:
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforce
> >
> > Follow-ups regarding these issues should be redirected to Psycho-Babble Administration. They, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bob
>
> Mr. Hsiung, Please redirect this to the admin board for I do not know the mechanics in doing so.
> You wrote,[...If you're prohibited from posting something here, please don't post how to find it elsewhere...].
> I am unsure as to what you are referring to here. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond according.
> The two prohibition that I know of are
>
> 1 That I do not post that it has been revealed to me from the god that I give service and worship to a commandment to me that I (redacted by respondent)
> 2. That I do not post what could be about the involvment in any way concening paychiatry or the chemistry that is in the historical record concerning a particular historical time period.
> Here are my concerns.
> A. Your statement to me states that one here can not post {how to find} those facts concerning those prohibitions by you. Here are some of my concerns:
> 1A. Could one here post that there will be a TV program airing on a particular channel at a particular time concerning those prohibitions by you from posting here?
> 2A. Could one post here to purchase a book at a particular store concerning those prohibitions from posting by you here?
> 3A. Could someone post here to go to an expert on the history of Judaism to discuss and find out about the prohibitions from posting by you here?
> 4A. Could someone post here to go to the site of the Anti-Defamation League and ask them to discuss the prohibitons from posting as you state here?
> 5A. Is there a balance here with your (redacted by respondent)
> 6A. I want to give infomation that I think here will save lives and that infomation could be in what you prohibit from posting here. But now you say that I can not post here how to get that infomation. If you think redacted by respondent)
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
Your prohibition that one here can not post telling how one could obtain infomation that you prohibit to be posted here brings up what you are doing here in relation to how you direct people to what is prohibited here.
You have posted a link that directs one to a table of contents that one could use to see a prohibited statement. You say that one would have to click twice to see it so you allow that way to see the prohibited, by you, content. You also have a post here with a search feature that one can look up what could be prohibited to post here. So there are ways to lead members to what you prohibit from posting, and even that you have used the table of contents method to allow members to see what you prohibit from posting.
Now I think that my format of having a member to click at least twice to see what you prohibit from posting is no different {from an ethical perspective} from that you have provided a link to what you posted, which was prohibited content, that leads to a table of contents that could allow mwmbers to see what you prohibit from posting used the table of contents method to allow mwmbers to see what was once posted by you, that you posted and then . I also think that by you allowing a search page for members that they could find what was removed to be in an ethical perspective to be analogous to the table of contents method that you use here to allow people to see what you say is prohibited from being posted. You see, I, in good faith, followed your example and can not understand why there is any difference, for my way and your way still allow members to see what you prohibit from posting.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:967900
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20101014/msgs/967902.html