Re: calculating blocks

Posted by Dr. Bob on June 17, 2010, at 3:25:59

In reply to Re: calculating blocks, posted by NKP on June 16, 2010, at 11:46:00

> > > > period of time since previous block: 8 weeks
>
> > The discrepancy is because that 8 is rounded.
>
> The 8 is rounded? To what? 10?
Sorry, what I meant was, the period of time since the previous block wasn't exactly 8.
Bob
"a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind" -- The New York Times

Thread

LYING ABOUT FB + TWTR....why am i not surprised? fayeroe 4/21/10
...
Re: In other words... BabyToes 4/27/10
Re: and so it goes, same old same old :( muffled 4/28/10
I am ashamed of myself! jane d 4/28/10
Re: and so it goes, same old same old :( » muffled Dinah 4/28/10
Re: blocked for 52 weeks » BabyToes Dr. Bob 4/28/10
Re: why? Dr. Bob 4/28/10
Re: why? Fred23 5/1/10
Re: blocked for 52 weeks » BabyToes floatingbridge 5/4/10
Re: blocked for 52 weeks » Dr. Bob NKP 6/13/10
Re: calculating blocks Dr. Bob 6/15/10
Re: calculating blocks NKP 6/16/10
Re:blocked for 52 weeks. The horse is dead. (nm) » NKP fayeroe 6/16/10
Re: calculating blocks Dr. Bob 6/17/10

Post a new follow-up

[951304]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:944420
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20100321/msgs/951304.html

	for
in