Posted by Lou Pilder on July 22, 2009, at 5:51:57
In reply to Re: Lou's request- » Lou Pilder, posted by Deneb on July 21, 2009, at 19:17:22
> Hey Lou,
>
> Sorry I don't have the energy to answer all your questions, but I will try to answer one. I was mainly talking about how Dr. Bob answers a lot of posts, I know he doesn't answer most. I'd say I'd be happy if he answered 1 in 20 posts. I ask Dr. Bob questions all the time and he doesn't answer me. Don't take it personally. I think he does answer you once in a while.
>
> Dr. Bob is probably too busy to answer all posts. Most of my posts are repetitive. I can't expect him to say "you're welcome" every single time I thank him. Once is enough. I just have this urge to keep thanking him and saying I love him. I don't expect a reply, but when I get one it is a nice surprise.Deneb,
You wrote,[...I know he (Mr. Hsiung) doesn;t answer most (posts)...], [...he doesn't answer me...], [...don't take it personally...],[...he does answer you once in a while...], [...(Mr. Hsiung) is probably too busy to answer all posts...], [... most of my posts are repetitive...I don't expect a reply...].
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here if your reply to me is in regards to the ongoing situation of that there are outstanding notifications from me to the administration, requests for rationales, requests for clarification concerning the rules and policy here and such and requests to have feedback by having dialog with the administration here.
The overiding concern of mine is that I am asking for the administration to respond to my requests because I think that the TOS here gives an expectation to the member that uses the notification system to receive a reply or a post in the thread involved. I also think that Mr. Hsiung invites members to ask him for his rationale(s) and to discuss rules and policy here, and importantly to discuss actions taken by the administration which could include IMO taking no action.
The importance to me is that there is the potential for me, and perhaps other Jews, to be a victim of antisemitic violence either physically or by emotional/ psychological violence by the nature that posts that have statements that could arrouse antisemitic feelings or lead a Jew to feel put down are not notated as being uncivil here and I am asking that the administration post in the thread where those posts are some notation that those statements are not civil according to the historical record where those type of statements that have been allowed by the administration to be unsanctioned to have the potential to inflame a community to persecute Jews.
You have written to me,[...don't take it personally...],
I am wondering as to what you are wanting to mean to me here by that. Could you post here some more to clarify what you are wanting to mean to me by that? If you could, then I could have the clarification needed for me to rule out or confirm what could come out of a statement like that to me here.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:905831
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090707/msgs/907899.html