Posted by Lou Pilder on August 8, 2007, at 16:12:21
In reply to Re: another PDP revision, posted by Dr. Bob on August 6, 2007, at 23:16:04
> > http://dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#harassed
> >
> > I believe part of the reason the PDNP revision came to be is that these requests occasionally appeared to be used as simply a way to, shall we say, express an opinion about a poster or make a direct statement to them that would not otherwise be considered acceptable. What could be more "expressive" than receiving a PDNP. Yet they were making it under the civility wire no matter what.
>
> It's a work in progress...
>
> And the next revision is that a poster can still request a PDP, but they should use the "notify administrators" button to do so, and if we're going to support it, we'll post it ourselves. I've updated the FAQ. Thanks,
>
> BobDR. Hsiung,
You wrote concerning the TOS here in regards to your PDP rule,something like,[...we >will< either post that we agree or we >will< let you know why we do not agree...we also may post that the post is uncivil...].
In response to that, I have the following requests for clarification:
A. What could be a reasonable time to expect that you will do one or the other?
B. During that time, can the poster post to the person issuing the PDP?
C. What can the poster issuing the PDP do if you do not do either in , let's say, 2 days?
C. Is the {notify the administraors}feature to be used for all members in relation to a PDP? If not, what members are to be treated differently and how?
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:754209
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/774857.html