Posted by Lou Pilder on March 22, 2007, at 17:40:36
In reply to The three posts rule, posted by Glydin on March 22, 2007, at 17:06:28
> Adm. has placed a three post rule to which IMO the majority of the posters here adhere to and have not protested. Given that, the expectation, as it appears to me, is that a poster should be able to express themselves in three or less consecutive posts. As posters we are ALL asked to adhere to that guideline with very few exceptions. I do not wish to see another exception.
>
> I DO NOT want the boards to return to the way they were prior to the three posts rule. That's my opinion, plain and simple. I feel the three post rule has a place and serves a good purpose for the whole of the community.Friends,
It is written here[...the majority...the way they were...serves a good purpose for the whole of the community...]
I am unsure as to what the {good purpose} is in the statement above. I am unsure because the purpose given in the TOS here is that the rule is made so that it could be easier for the {less confident poster} to join in.
But could not some other way be made to accommodate those members than to have this rule? I would like to have this rule have the exception that I am requesting in order so that I can discuss statements that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or to put down Jews or to be not sensitive to the feelings of Jews or to be not supportive without having to wait for another poster or, I guess, the leas confident poster to post. I could need to be able to break this down into very small parts so that others could see it. One long post could have the potential IMO to be too much for some to remeber all in the one long post. And I received thanks from other members here. There are also posts by members here that do not agree with the rule in question here. I think that I have a good purpose to request that my needs in relation to discussing the actions of the administration and the policy concerning statement that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings to be IMO a good purpose for the exception to be established.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:742078
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070304/msgs/743287.html